10,524 karma · joined August 15, 2007
The mimicbots are impressive but they're frustrating. We've hit the limit for pre-training data and now we're relying on RL for the next progressive steps and that gets asymptotic fast. The truth is that unsupervised learning hasn't inched forward and we don't know how it will, so we're left with benchmaxxing and LARPing about how they're escaping air-gapped configs using themal sensors, all in a desperate attempt to make the projected numbers look less insane so these people can cash out at IPO time. Everyone knows what's happening and it's embarrassing.
For more context on these numbers: when I started posting these, first, I wasn't consistent, and second, I was doing something that, to the algorithm, looked suspicious, so I think the posts had a negative weight.
In 2024, HN reached out and it got more of an official blessing for me to run these, and we set an official day of the month (the second Sunday), which in turn made me more consistent.
People were sad when we moved from horses to cars; they loved their horses, they named them. That didn't stop the slow, glacial, detached march of the calendar, of progress, and in this example, of the wheel.
What's more interesting is the long, overarching news stories that span decades, e.g. BRICS, and the demise of the petro-dollar
If a single country's currency is the global reserve currency, all you're finding out is whose thumb you're under.
P.S. Credit to adityaathalye for the change of phrasing for these posts to add "what are you curious about?"
I like accelerator pedals on cars, I do, but I also like the brake pedal.
But as an American who has spent decades living in Europe (across five different countries), I'm confident that this isn't just a mistaken impression.
> We don’t care for our children, our elderly, or our communities. It’s all me me me. How do I get mine and fuck the other guy.
Capitalism, I'm looking at you.
I would prefer if I could restrict it to a style or movement, say, "Baroque" or period "1400-1600". I think it would make it both more interesting and the learning more memorable.
The author is saying that what James Joyce called ‘proper’ art is essentially a stepping stone for our understanding of the world and ourselves. And if that's true, it could possibly be a candidate for human exceptionalism, and that would be a differentiator between AI and humans, where AI can only mimic what has been done -- up to this step but no further.
Unfortunately, the author is a poor lawyer and argues against his own case. One exhibit is Rothko. Yes, Rothko was important in expanding our ideas of color and composition... but he did that through such works as a big red square. Could silicon randomly generate a big red square? Yeah. So where is that line? Sometimes it's our interpretation of a work that moves us forward, more than the work itself.
Which means humanity invents humanity.