Measurement (if any) should be on the realised gains in the short and long term, not the visible investment. LOC, tickets closed, hours spent etc can all have negative payoffs.
Unfortunately that is hard to measure, as Rachel points out.
6,263 karma · joined May 3, 2009
Measurement (if any) should be on the realised gains in the short and long term, not the visible investment. LOC, tickets closed, hours spent etc can all have negative payoffs.
Unfortunately that is hard to measure, as Rachel points out.
Well, until Lloyd’s did lose a lot of money in 1991, and the Names had too much exposure. Berkshire Hathaway cover them now, I believe.
The author mentioned they were having a few beers, I think we should give them a break. I understood what they were saying.
The McLaren F-duct, the Mercedes toe-in reducing steering wheel, and asymmetric braking systems in the 1990s McLarens and supposedly this year's Red Bulls were examples of true ingenuity, I think.
$ curl http://playin.coz.is/index.html
curl: (7) Failed to connect to playin.coz.is port 80 after 166 ms: Couldn't connect to server
The Renault F1 engine could famously play tunes this way.
I guess that most of these are to "people of lower income". I have purchased devices there for my children.
Apple was challenged by shareholders to only commit to environmental or accessibility projects if they increased ROI. Tim Cook rejected that out of hand [1].
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/mar/03/tim-cook...
https://freakonomics.com/podcast/why-is-23andme-going-under-...
I worked on a Y2K project in 98-99 for a major car manufacturer. They tested the ERP system for Y2K (in 1997) and it failed, in a way that would make the business fail. They replaced it via this project and the business continued to be successful without interruption.
Another company I know of simply backdated their whole system by 10 years. This worked, but unfortunately the contract cycle renegotation reminders then did not appear, and competitors took many of their contracts over the next year or so. They went out of business in a couple of years.
I implemented a new manufacturing and retail system in 1992, and we used 4 digit years. The company owner complained that they were a needless expense and annoyance and that there was plenty of time to deal with Y2K. They continued to use the system well into the 2000s.
The space shuttle never flew over New Year's eve/day as they couldn't handle a single year rollover, let alone a century. Some use cases can simply avoid the problem.
I work with people whose days are a sequence of meetings and chats within meetings. They don't understand (or respect) that I have meetings but also must concentrate for periods of time.
[1] https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=volume+of+all+humans
Some people are completely comfortable with being late, or having smudged glasses, or driving erratically - it does not bother them in the slightest.
Their world is completely different to mine, and it's not that they don't care about the sloppy code or that they are too lazy to polish it - they don't even see it.
Humans are surprisingly diverse in how their brains work.
Example (hard to find because no-one takes photos of the ugly buildings in Warsaw):
https://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-70660934,width-640...
In 8 years, €800 billion of suspicious transactions flowed through Danske Bank Estonia, which is over 5 x Estonian GDP during that period. Five times!
If this does not set off alarm bells, then checking my little transactions is not going to solve anything. Security theatre.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danske_Bank_money_laundering_s...
Edit: 1980, found it.
http://davidbuckley.net/RS/mmouse/images/PM80p17article1268....
In this case, a person was yelling through the front door "Your door is wide open!" and no-one was listening.
For a 42B AUM company, at a time where running an IT operation means "use CrowdStrike so that you pass audits", leaving the front door open all night should get you fired, regardless of whether you blame hackers or not.
This CEO of a balloon company doesn’t seem to understand how balloons work.
I understood that Myers-Briggs and other pseudo-scientific categorizations that value direction over degree and therefore produce polarization rather than distribution ("You are 51% extrovert in most situations? Come over here with all the other extroverts") are rather discredited these days.