509 karma · joined March 11, 2009
Over the last couple of years I've tried a few times at different vendors to find a different laptop, and every time I've given up because of all the options.
My problem is that when I'm presented with so many options, I spend hours trying to optimize them, and being unable, I give up.
I think http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Paradox_of_Choice:_Why_More... has something to say about this.
Premise 3 was:
> Most freelancers will not build and/or follow-through with their ideas, because they perceive their opportunity cost to be too high.
I wouldn't quit my job for this (if I had a job), but as a freelancer I'd consider taking a month of no client work and building it at what amounts to a reduced hourly rate.
All of the sudden recently I noticed a lot of single word quoted replies happening to me, and I figured it was a bug.
> To read them back in, you fed the tape into the terminal and it simulated typing your source back into the computer.
reminded me of this story (which came at a much later date):
> A senior NASDAQ official saw Peterffy's setup and said Peterffy was breaking the rules: All orders had to be entered through the keyboard. He gave Petterfy's group one week to fix the problem.
> Peterffy and his engineers came up with a solution. They built a robot with rubber fingers that typed entries into the keyboard.
(from http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/08/27/159992076/a-father...)
Edit: It's a side note to the posted story, but it's interesting to me that we replace technical limitations with policy limitations.
You may be able to refinance the loan through another bank, which would pay off this one and let you go with someone more reasonable.
I think you needed to be logged in (or it would ask you to log in), but the point was that it didn't require a Google Plus account.
I think it would be cool if they made some aggregate data like that available though. =)
I have a friend in the Bay Area who started in .NET, and had so much trouble hiring programmers they scrapped it and started in a more fashionable platform.
I don't know what others' experience is like, but you might consider the ramifications of that potential problem.
On the other hand, I have done a couple of test/soft-launches this year, and have lost my fear of failing on those. That's more than I had done in the prior 10 years of being a programmer with aspirations, so it's progress.
I still struggle with probably doing too much before testing an idea, but I also struggle with doing too little, so I'm trying to find a balance. Learning, still, really.
I guess one way to ask it might be, "how does one find a straightforward path to an unknown destination?"
I found myself really liking this section. Unfortunately, I think it was because it helped validate my inner fears that manifest as procrastination.
Overall, I liked the article, but be wary of using those early stages as a excuse on which to continue doing nothing.
The question I had after reading that was "who thought to ask about building a digital music streaming service in 1995?"
I was a little disappointed the post didn't cover that.
Statements like that remind me of the often cited "I could have done that" when people talk about art.
Using Google Chrome 12.0.742.122 on Mac OS 10.6
Where on wikipedia did you learn about it? (I'm assuming that was what the "Wikipedia++" was for -- If not, care to elaborate?)
How does that play into this?
I don't think the pricing is the hard part - it's getting them to buy. And I'm not convinced those two are completely related.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727781.400-brainhack...
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727781.500-brainhack...
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727781.000-brainhack...
It may be a fine line, but I've noticed myself hitting a lot of new sites thinking "why don't they just tell me what it is/does and show me some screen shots before I have to sign up?"
I think it's a big deal. I almost always pass without it.