Chute (YC W12) Launches A Twilio For Photos
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
It looks like E-Bay discontinued the IPIX integration and brought all that in-house, effectively killing IPIX's main cash cow (which was already anaemic after the dot-com crash). See this article from 2003: http://www.auctionbytes.com/cab/abn/y03/m09/i22/s01 . I wish the YC company best of luck in addressing this similar market.
I think IPIX' original product idea was a special camera to take 360-radial or 360-spherical photos and let people host those images on their website. Web clients needed a special plugin to view the results. Using these became popular on various real-estate websites for a while. It looks from IPIX website (http://www.ipix.com/) that that's their main focus again.
A former IPIX employee, Adam Sah, took some rudimentary log-aggregation tech he built for monitoring the IPIX servers, got permission to start a new company, and founded Addamark, now SenSage (http://www.sensage.com). They implemented one of the first columnar databases to minimize large-scale log aggregation storage space (logs take 2.5% the space required in a traditional DB) and to speed up queries. Many other companies are adopting this strategy (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Column-oriented_DBMS). Here's the columnar-database patent: http://www.google.com/patents?id=q4d4AAAAEBAJ&printsec=f...
I worked at Addamark/SenSage for almost 4 years, it was a very good experience.
The Internet now is a lot different from 2003 -- there are more sites than just eBay and a few hundred others -- back then you needed to raise Series A of $20mm to run a big startup, now you can do it by getting rid of your car payment.
Presumably Chute is going to be the kind of tool which would have let eBay build their in-house photo tool faster. This might not have worked in 2003, and maybe can work now.
It's more an analogy and definitely not the ideal, most precise way to describe what we do.
We're much more likely to consider ourselves akin to Heroku as we offer infrastructure and connections to services that make deploying and running super simple. Not to say that Twilio doesn't accomplish the same for tons of folks.
I'm sure we'd use Twilio to accomplish it as well :)
[Chute] handles the entire backend environment for uploading, processing, authenticating, resizing, and serving images.
...for example, you’re running a popular website and you want all of your users to be able to have profile images, you can sign up for Chute and paste a few lines of code into your application, and that’s it. Users will then be able to upload images to Chute’s servers, where they will be cropped, resized, etc. according to your specifications, before being served onto your site.
That's pretty useful!
It'll be interested to see the common man's web stack in a few years.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3594401 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1049903 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2877026
Though I'm not sure how mission critical this is.. it's something you can easily find a gem for, and adjust for your own use in a couple of hours. And if you're a photo sharing startup/business, I would assume you wouldn't want to outsource something that I'd consider part of your core.
You are absolutely right that there are many ways to accomplish basic uploading and hosting. In fact, we've used those same gems time and time again and it was the process of re-building it that seemed problematic. When we started working on mobile, however, most of those things were not as readily available or accessible.
That said, we're much more focused on the workflow that is required to make those photos useful. For example, if you're a publisher, you may need to have rights cleared, captions, user information collected, and even moderation before any user-generated content is "usable" to you.
We're happy to help anyone get their prototype running and hopefully offer enough value on top that they won't ever want to leave.
I'd love to replace that with Chute. Checking it out now.
I'm curious about the previous project - lifegrams.com - I was talking to my OH about a similar idea just a few hours ago.
Would be interested to see a lessons-learned for the previous project. Was it successful, if not as successful as hoped, why not, how much traction, what could have been done differently, etc.
I'd love to see a service like this for Video. We currently have to content manage a ton of video for our Video Based eLearning application and it sucks to have to manage encodings file upload/download and streaming. I'd like to outsource all of that and focus on just building a great learning platform.
User-generated content has definitely posed new challenges for them and we're working to package the platform in a way that makes it a lot easier.
We used Zencoder for a similar purpose last year and it helped to encode video files as well. The pricing on these services to make your image-related pain go away is totally worth it.
pic related (french translation of a famous movie): http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UzYc8Z-JK08/TsAvnQEJgjI/AAAAAAAAAV...
Was awesome meeting you guys at AngelHack over the weekend.
Your stuff is legit and I'll be spreading the good word to my photo-centric entrepreneurs.
Less stuff for them to worry about.
-Mat