Are you actually shipping to costumers?
I was super excited back then about your product and company, but the rebrandings and lack of communication made me wary.
2,577 karma · joined December 29, 2019
Are you actually shipping to costumers?
I was super excited back then about your product and company, but the rebrandings and lack of communication made me wary.
I also like that jax.jit forces you to write "functional" functions free of side effects or inplace array updates. It might feel weird at first (and not every algorithm is suited for this style) but ultimately it leads to clearer and faster code.
I am surprised that JIT in PyTorch gets so little attention. Maybe it's less impactful for PyTorch's usual usecase of large networks, as opposed to general scientific computing?
I'm wondering if some underlying mechanism in the brain is similar between having ADHD and having suffered a stroke. Or maybe it's just the conscious effort how to handle the symptoms that's similar.
This is the usecase mentioned in the article and it wouldn't work with a bare repo. But if the server your SSH'ing to is just a central point to sync code across machines, then you're right: multiple hoops mentioned in the article are solved by having the central repo bare.
In practice however most programs seem to include fonts in exported PDFs?
https://store.steampowered.com/app/3809900/Habbo_Hotel_Origi...
I'm surprised that a "truly offline" workplace allows servers to be taken home and being connected to the internet.
This app is keeping me on iOS as there is no single-app replacement on Android afaik.
I think cooling with an open freezer is impossible in general? Or is that your point and I don't understand the argument?
I audibly wtf'ed multiple times while going down this rabbit hole. Thanks!
My comment was about "confusing backpropagation with gradient descent (or any optimizer)."
For me the connection is pretty clear? The core issue is confusing backprop with minimization. The cited article mentioning supervised learning specifically doesn't take away from that.
I guess giving the (mathematically) simple principle of computing a gradient with the chain rule the fancy name "backpropagation" comes from the early days of AI where the computers were much less powerful and this seemed less obvious?
return -np.sum(p * np.log(p, where=p > 0))
Using `where` in ufuncs like log results in the output being uninitialized (undefined) at the locations where the condition is not met. Summing over that array will return incorrect results for sure.Better would be e.g.
return -np.sum((p * np.log(p))[p > 0])
Also, the cross entropy code doesn't match the equation. And, as explained in the comment below the post, Ax+b is not a linear operation but affine (because of the +b).Overall it seems like an imprecise post to me. Not bad, but not stringent enough to serve as a reference.
In any case, I agree that a second opinion would be most helpful.
This is exactly opposite to how I understood and experienced healing after Trans-PRK. My eyes are still very dry 6 months post surgery. Being at the upper limit of Trans-PRK yourself, did you actually go through with the surgery? If yes, how was your healing process? I would be very interested in chatting about it, since I am not particularly happy with mine, and wondering what can be done (and whom to blame).
> Numpy also needs to be paired with a JIT compiler to make python a real array language
You can, at least on iOS. You screenshot the QR code(s) in GAuth and read them into Proton Authenticator.
> So, I removed it. In DumPy you can only do AB if one of A or B is scalar or A and B have exactly the same shape. That’s it, anything else raises an error. Instead, use indices, so it’s clear what you’re doing.
I also dislike the seemingly inconsistent adding of last axes with length 1.
I do like the capability that existing axes of length 1 will be broadcasted to any length of the other array in the operation, and use that all the time.
If I understand the text correctly, the author removed that as well.