1,778 karma · joined February 10, 2019
Join us on https://www.reddit.com/r/saas !
@chddaniel on Twitter
You write your full idea, then you create a new 'layer', and have to cut down on words. Basically distilling what you're trying to say. In the end you'll end up with the 'shortest' layer of the message.
I built it partly with the aim of helping remote workers 'learn' how to write better
Curve is not my main card, but as for the crypto.com, Wirecard doesn't hold their funds.
1) Doesn't it make sense for them to do that? After offering the search engine for free for ages (not that paid search engines are a thing) and playing an important role in building the internet? For most, all the internet they know is thanks to Google
2) Wouldn't you do the same? Keep in mind they're a public company and we know how incentives are aligned when you're a public company
1. Hmm, the concept is: the more layers, the better. This way, you can easily "pick your pace" — if you're short on time and you want easily-consumable content, you'd skim through 1-min versions. Ideally if at a certain point you say "holy shit, I love this", you'd jump to the full version. The same way you don't just skim your favourite author's new article — you just go to the full version because he's proven time and time again that his style fits you
2. Oh? Tell me more? Did I get you right: showing it to ppl who bypass the 280-char-limit by having tweet storms/threads? P.S: I love Dynasty's logo!!!
Indeed, there are problems with Twitter, people take stuff out of context and like to be polarized. But just as you say, the first time I interacted with Twitter I loved the fact that I had to "distill" my idea.
Kinda like Vodka — you keep distilling alcohol until you purify it (or close to it). What you're saying about "refining the idea" made me think about this.
1. Let people brain dump — write everything they've got on their mind. Click "new layer". Cut down on words. Click "new layer". Cut down on words. Repeat ad nauseam.
Every time you write a new layer, you're "editing" your article so as to make it shorter. In other words, you're purifying the idea
2. Let people write the shortest version, then write a bit more, then more.
I'm doing way #1 because I feel like road #2 prevents people from having a brain dump... I'd lose all my ideas if I'd start with the short verison
It's essentially the reverse way of what writers do when they write the "tweet version" of their essay — plus all the steps in-between.
@ your last sentence: Check out the InVision link I've added to the OP!
Here's how I see what I described earlier: https://invis.io/GQWINO2YKU2#/410298082_1_Min_Verison
What do you think?
Here's how I see what I described earlier: https://invis.io/GQWINO2YKU2#/410298082_1_Min_Verison
What do you think?
The problem? Tweets are easier to read than long-form essays, as they require less time commitment. If the content is not good on a long-form article, you'll find out way too late. With this tool I'm developing:
Layer 1 is the shortest version of your essay, the 1 min read — like a tweet. The idea boiled down to the shortest version
Layer 2 is the same text from layer 1, but with extras added here and there. What's already read by you is in black ink. What's new is in blue ink. This is the 2 min read version
Layer 3 shows everything from Layer 1 and 2 in black ink, but what's new is now in blue ink. and you keep doing that until you get to the full version.
I can post some screenshots here of my mockups, as I'm a designer. PM me if you find this intriguing!
——
Edit: Since people are showing interest, here's how I see it happening — https://invis.io/GQWINO2YKU2#/410298082_1_Min_Verison
The first thing that you see is the first layer (1 min version). Go right for 3 and 5 min version!
——
Edit 2: since I'm seeing the upvotes and the emails, I quickly made this sign-up form for the people who want to be updated when the product is done: https://layered-ink.webflow.io/
I would put up the https://layered.ink link but the domain hasn't been propagated yet.
@Admins — please do let me know if this is not permitted so I can take it down. Apologies if so.
Would you be paying for a web-based email client for all your email accounts, in order to avoid this transfer?