You can't be serious. In a court of law, Gawker was found to be (extremely) wrong, and outing people ain't cool.
It was anything but shady.
You have the wealth of human knowledge at your fingertips, don't spread misinformation.
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget
Edit: Since the point score on this comment has oscillated up and down fairly quickly, here is a link from the World Bank detailing both total military spending and spending relative to gdp for various/most countries. A lack of consensus is fine but opinions should be informed when possible: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS
Anecdotally, you may have seen stories like the military paying 10k for a toilet cover.
It's accurate to say that the US has a overblown military budget. In my opinion, this money would be far better spent on universal healthcare like other reasonable countries do.
[1] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?most_...
[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/the-...
Better comparisons are Police ($100B) and prisons ($80B) but really you should be looking at spending as a percent of GDP. Defense is about 3% of GDP.
So we spend (nominally) 7% of our GDP to take care of our elderly. We spend (nominally again) 3% to police the world. No other country comes close to us in military spending but we probably make more from our empire than it costs for us to maintain it. At least so long as we don't get into too many stupid wars (cough cough Iraq).
I can see what we get for SS and Medicare and I'm fine with the taxes to support it. I'd feel a lot better about the military spending if less went to crazy boondoggles like the F-22. It feels like a giant waste -- we shipped all our factories to China and none of this crazy fancy tech is going to help us if we get in a fight with them.
Palantir feels like it might be another boondoggle but I've seen a bit of it at a large company I work with and it actually solves some real problems. It appears to be a slick integration of Spark and Git. It has some potential to solve problems that they haven't been able to touch in the 10 years I've been contracting for them.
The statement that defense is the largest discretionary part of the federal government is an indisputable fact.
Your position appears to boil down to "if the author had said something different, they'd be right!" - yes, I'll agree with that. It doesn't make the original statement true.
Why? Palantir grew to be a unicorn (not just a unicorn, but a decacorn) under a Democratic federal government.