123 karma · joined January 14, 2020
I thought the consensus was that the looters were mostly young out-of-states whites? And to insinuate that the President had read some 1940s Florida mayor's (sorry, I can't remember who the saying is originally attributed to) speeches and knew the connotations of that phrase is ridiculous.
Perhaps because sexism in this instance is completely acceptable? I'm not objecting to that, by the way.
Only if the humans were making decision to buy and sell randomly.
Is this necessarily the right move? I have a vague recollection of reading about Singapore and their approach to attaining top talent to the public sector with high wages. I could be totally wrong!
Yeah, I was very hesitant to ask so as not to seem like I didn't think they've looked into it..
All the best to you as well.
>My brain chemistry is irreversibly fucked for lack of a better word
Are you sure it's completely irreversible?
x = 0.999...
to
2x = 1.999..
It very clearly is.
So make it wealth based?
>Let me be clear though: this is purely against your affirmative action points. Any potential discrimination against Asians outside of affirmative action is unacceptable.
Why draw the line arbitrarily at affirmative action? Why not housing as well? Maybe a quota on high-paying jobs?