463 karma · joined October 16, 2016
[1] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-31/japans-cherry-blossom...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coral_bleaching#Pacific_Ocean
[3] https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/fuel-moisture-content...
[4] https://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-chang...
`history | awk '{print $4}' | sort | uniq -c | sort`
56 tree
58 make
59 youtube-dl
69 cmake
71 which
76 docker
78 scala
80 drive
80 wget
96 curl
99 head
102 echo
105 pip
114 scp
119 ssh
131 open
135 conda
135 kubectl
141 man
181 sudo
298 mkdir
350 grep
378 ls
409 find
415 mv
544 cp
553 python
568 brew
601 cat
674 rm
1928 vim
1972 cd
2845 git
Also, I'm noticing this won't catch anything in pipes otherwise I'd expect to see less and xargs pretty high up.- Talent just obfuscates the qualitative attributes that contribute to excellence.
- Individuals are identified as talented usually after they have invested effort.
- Talent is a quick and spurious "explanation" or admittance of unexplained variance.
[1] https://fermatslibrary.com/s/the-mundanity-of-excellence-an-...
At the end of the day, double entry accounting is double entry accounting and you should be able to move transaction journals between the tools. I haven't tested any of these, but it looks like there are various techniques / tools that make gnucash <-> ledger possible.
- https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Ledger-CLI
- https://github.com/icyflame/gnucash-xml-to-ledger-dat
- ...
So many factors are leading to increased number of undergraduate degrees... not limited to degree mills, grade inflation, standardized testing, and availability of virtually everything in undergrad curriculum available for "reference" online. This simultaneously increases the number of undergraduate degrees while decreasing the average quality. Institutions that rely on the formerly strong "has a degree" signal are finding that the signal is weakening. Undergraduates now failing to signal are somewhat forced to pursue more education.
I see the same thing happening with masters degrees. Universities seem to increasingly offer combined BS and MS programs. I don't believe strong MS students are formed by tacking on just an extra year to a BS program.
Finally, another observation on STEM fields: due to the funding situation and glut of PhD's it appears to be incredibly difficult to build a solid STEM career without a PhD. Undergrads in certain STEM areas try to leave university only to find out that they actually need more credentials to meaningfully work in the field they just spent 4 years studying for.
Edit: Sorry, also meant to ask for a reference on _all_ life disappearing due to climate change. Perhaps all human life, but life in general seems pretty resilient. Eg. recent headline [1]: Scientists revive 100 million-year-old microbes from deep under seafloor.
[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-science-microbes-idUSKCN2...
Just pay people for the value they provide. I think there's some room to argue that a remote only employee provides less value. Everyone in the same timezone, lack of face to face time, hallway encounters, going out to lunch, etc. have tangible value to the employer that is lost in the transition to remote work. But the arguments I see from Facebook and in this article are about cost of living. That's wrong. Price it based on value created by the employee.
If the permanence of remote work indeed turns into a long term trend, I think we're going to see some bumpy road ahead while individuals grapple with first moving and then local supply and demand in their new location. Fix your location, and then consider that if given the same pay, and same work, would you rather work remotely or in person? I would rather work in person for a couple of reasons including socialization, removal of distractions in a workplace environment, etc.