1,359 karma · joined June 10, 2013
For me getting in to genealogy was a two week thing, I found all relatives 4-5 generations back. After that I got bored. Sometimes it’s fun when 23andme finds someone that I am related to and I get to figure out in which way.
Finding a hole in a piece of plastic does not require that. Or so it seams to me.
My current bank has OCR reading of invoices built in to their app but that feels like a bit of a hack.
Which In turn makes my think about if the Swedish postgiro/bankgiro payment system would work with this type of link.
One cigarette a day is about how much I can do and actually cognitively recognize the effects.
That is not to say that some part of me does not want to smoke more than one. Cause there is such a part of me. But I as a verbal entity can not justify it in any way. It just does nothing. In fact it makes me feel worse.
To me Joshua Bach’s explanation of consciousness covers all the bases.
It is a logical explanation that explains consciousness without the need for magic. Whether or not it covers what you want from a consciousness explanation I can’t tell.
That it is not more accepted seams strange, but it is fairly new and people in philosophy are famously slow when it comes to change. So I guess it makes sense.
json_decode(“[“.implode($lines,”,\n”).”]”)
That is insane! To me it seams like something that could be done with 2-3 guys over 6 months with room to spare.
But yeah I get it they have the money and everyone wants to work with their friends.
Media attention == media sales
Well... that is how I see it.
Some people define the self in such a way that free will can’t exist and others define the self in a way so that free will must exist ie. It could not possibly not exist.
Especially in relation to “neurological disorders” like ADHD. Where some people blame their ADHD for their behavior. Or basically anything that has to do with personality. It is clearly as you say tautological. You have a certain personality because you behave in a certain way, you don’t behave in a certain way cause you have a certain personality.
But then you have the fact that earlier personality can be used to predict future personality and future behavior. It is not causal but it is predictive.
Some people call that causal people in social science. I think that is twisting the definition of “causal”.
”There are no open source LTE stack to learn from”
That is not true, srsRAN is a opensource LTE project.
That has both cell phone and tower versions. Runs on SDR boards like the limeSDR.Why should the fact that the conversation is held with a phone change things?
The arguments only holds if you forbid all recording.
Reductio ad absudum.
I once got a call from a person threatening my life. I find it hard to justify not being able to record such a thing because of some strange hypothetical scenario about bad actors recording calls.
To be honest I can’t think of any scenario where recording your own calls would be bad. Can you give me a example?
> But people can make you think the thoughts and feel the feelings that you wouldn't have otherwise. And those new things can improve your understanding of yourself.
True. However those insights can’t be reached from learning about them through a verbal description on the meta level like they are in this article. If I tell you it is good to be happy does that realization make you happy? No. To make you happy I must “manipulate” you (or to use terminology from the article your elephant) into being happy. Just telling you “be happy” does not work.
Or maybe it can and I have just never been able to find anyone that is able to.
Basically you understand other people with reference to your understanding of yourself, to become better at understanding other people you need to change the way you understand yourself.
Someone else will not be able to change your understanding of yourself. You must do that yourself.
* Every user in the web interface gets a sql database user.
* A change in the database schema should reflect an instant change in the AP GUI.
A dream that I have worked towards step by step in a few different projects. I am not sure about how it scales to millions of users. But if you have a a few 100 to a thousand users. It should be fine. Main problem i have found is row level security. The app should basically just be a graphical interface that can be configured. Through a config file.
In my life I have seen project managers getting played for fools over and over. If the project manager can’t asses if something like a time estimate is reasonable people will take advantage. The cost, the timeline and the deliverables will suffer.
But the fact that people at apple are stating it publicly is somewhat peculiar.
You send outgoing packets simultaneously from both sides. Causing both sides to add nat translation entry’s to their nat tables. When the packets arrive both sides already have nat translation entries and the packets go right through the nat.
You are not going to change the world, just buy the cheep tv and use it as a dumb tv.