No because only SIGQUIT, SIGABRT, SIGKILL, SIGTERM and often SIGHUP are supposed to do that. All of the other signals have wildly varying meanings. See man 7 signal: http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?signal+7
Great, now I just need a third-party package manager that only runs on their own javascript environment. Whenever I write a web application in something other than javascript (happens), that's quite a build dependency right there. I'd rather not have Ruby gems and npm packages in a Python project, for example.
...says the crazy communist. Certamen ad hominem in infinitum, ac vicit nemo (or some such). According to the dictionary ( http://thesaurus.com/browse/libertarian ) we could go on for a while, it's just utterly pointless. Rather than pointing fingers (babies can do that much), I'm merely asking a simple question why said libertarians would be crazy. FMR
Some of the attacks might actually be due to ISP misconfiguration or legal (court order) compliance. For instance, The Pirate Bay is blocked by several ISPs and exit nodes in their network would inadvertently be unable to route traffic to that site.
I expect an init system to be an init system, not to also be pm-utils, (x)inetd, acpid, syslogd, watchdog, cron and atd. I also expect it to have configuration files I can change, not to have everything symlinked to /usr. (If I can even find the right configuration file in that mess of directories, that is.)
Grunt only takes 10 minutes to set up (5 minutes to add it to package.json and copy a working gruntfile, another 5 to realise grunt-cli should also be in the list of dev dependencies).
You don't need those virtual machines if you use pbuilder. All builds will run under the same kernel but if it's affected by that you're doing weird things. Also, your package shouldn't depend on any meta package as it's bad style (what if that package drops a dependency you relied on?). A good package lists only the bare minimum dependencies needed to get it to work (but under Debian may recommend and suggest other packages to go along with it).
Yes, but you're talking about TV's where it's fine if it has a 16:9 aspect because all of the content is in 16:9. If I buy a monitor, I want it to have a proper 16:10 aspect because it matches the ratio of the W*XGA displays it would replace/complement. More specifically, I don't want to be left out of those extra lines and would feel cheated by Dell in this regard if I either bought it or had to use one due to a budget stricken IT department. A TV is a TV and a monitor is a monitor. The thing they're selling is a TV without a tuner and remote control, marketed as a monitor.