435 karma · joined February 23, 2015
https://github.com/brianclements
http://brianclements.net
In the HN community, non-constructive commenting is pretty strongly discouraged and moderated, so the urge to say things that normally would make someone want to hide their comments behind an anonymous name is pretty limited already.
So if nefarious activity is already not your goal, it simply becomes a personal preference. Why hide honest questions and discussion?
The only exception I can think of is if you're not well versed in the various knowledge domains that are popular here and don't want to give that fact away. I don't think that's a good reason at all though to be honest. I've felt this community be pretty accepting of honest questions and thoughtful input as long as you are honest with yourself as to what you're area of expertise is and you've done due diligence to the topic. If you're guessing something, you are going to be called out pretty quick. Don't ask for easily searchable facts, it's a waste of everyones time. Ask for opinions, experiences, etc.
Standard bookmark with optional quote via highlighting:
%T %N %B %U %N %L %N %?[S{"%S"}]
Long form quote: via %U%N%L%N%N%?[S{"%S"}]
Long form quote with annotations: #note via %U%N%L%N%N%?[S{"%S"}]%N----%N
If I highlight your post and use the first template, it displays as: The Sad State of Personal Knowledgebases | Hacker News
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10739227
12/18/2015, 10:04:11 AM
"A friend showed me http://gethibou.com/ yesterday. Basically the idea seems to be that you bookmark a page, highlight what you want to remember and they use spaced-repetition to help you remember it. It might go along well with the PK that you created yourself."
[1]http://www.borngeek.com/firefox/coltUsed it for the book list.
The key information they presented was that just because bacteria evolve quickly to modern forms of antibiotics, doesn't mean they don't also reduce to their tolerance to older (in this case, 1000 years older) antibiotic-like medicines that we would dismiss outright because it wasn't created in the modern age. Old medicine was very much trial and error, but it doesn't mean it can't also be effective or worth looking into deeper for ideas.
I'm convinced this type of rhetoric forces an additional cognitive load on the child's brain that helps with context, perspective, and self-awareness which in my mind, are the absolute most powerful aspects of becoming an intelligent individual. This is sort of the basis of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as well and is the most important "gateway" concept when teaching anyone anything.
What's interesting about the underlying implications of all these quotes to me is that what makes a good physicist, a good artist, or a good anything, is the unabashed curiosity, a willingness to experiment without being stopped by fear of failure, and the state of play that one must be in to unleash creative approaches and new connections.
[1]http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/p/pablopicas169744.... [2]https://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_cre...
I won't deny though that for mobile use, it's a bit cumbersome. The Android app is fine and free[3], and iOS app is a buck[4]. And overall it's a pain if you must login to sites frequently (ideally, using a native app reduces this greatly, login once until you manually logout).
It's also pretty confusing for non-technical people to get behind. I actually sent out an entire email blast to friends and family giving them my best attempt at an explanation, argument, and tutorial of how to use it. I don't think anyone did it.
So while the interface is kind of clumsy, the strategy is solid and I love knowing that I can use it.
[1]: http://www.supergenpass.com
[2]: https://github.com/chriszarate/supergenpass/issues/40#issuec...
[3]: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.staticfre...
[4]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/supergenpass/id451606360?mt=...
I think that is the key. The open source process just works on a much slower time frame then what is required of what was pretty much a VC business model.
>"...if they had built the platform and then had their employees focused on leading projects, being the passionate leaders projects need and giving the community"
I do think a platform like this could work, they would have to incorporate what is essentially a match making service between founders and the existing open source projects. Once a project finds a critical mass of clarity, it gets infused with purpose and direction by a founder.
I've long imagined what a software spec would look like for one trying to build an AI. I imagine it would be equal parts technical and philosophical.
I personally think more AI firms and researchers need to permanently employ professional artists, teachers, and creative types. But perhaps I too may be biased ;)
addendum: I would add that mediums are usually just incidental and necessary means to get to content. Why force everyone to adopt a medium (adobe binaries) to get to the real focus? The content? Instead, just package the content, and people are great and finding their own paths to it via plugins if the interface and code is open and standardized.
"I am a big advocate for the pursuit of curiosity. You've maybe heard me talk about this before? We are constantly being told to pursue our passions in life, but there are times when passion is a TALL ORDER, and really hard to reach. In seasons of confusion, of loss, of boredom, of insecurity, of distraction, the idea of "passion" can feel completely inaccessible and impossible. In such times, you are lucky to be able to get your laundry done (that sometimes feels as high as you can aim) and when someone tells you to follow your passion, you want to give them the middle finger. (Go ahead and do it, by the way. But wait till their back is turned, out of civility.)
But curiosity, I have found, is always within reach.
Passion is a tower of flame, but curiosity is a tiny tap on the shoulder — a little whisper in the ear that says, "Hey, that's kind of interesting…"
Passion is rare; curiosity is everyday.
Curiosity is therefore a lot easier to reach at at times than full-on passion — and the stakes are lower, easier to manage.
The trick is to just follow your small moments of curiosity. It doesn't take a massive effort. Just turn your head an inch. Pause for a instant. Respond to what has caught your attention. Look into it a bit. Is there something there for you? A piece of information?
For me, a lifetime devoted to creativity is nothing but a scavenger hunt — where each successive clue is another tiny little hit of curiosity. Pick each one up, unfold it, see where it leads you next.
Small steps.
Keep doing that, and I promise you: The curiosity will eventually lead you to the passion.
And that'll be the end of boredom." [1]
[1] http://www.elizabethgilbert.com/one-of-the-greatest-quotes-o...
Popularity on a Google search of a software term is of course going to win the popularity contest, it's the Internet. Do the same search of economic journals and you'll probably find the bias toward "nudge" over "dark patterns" in an extreme way. Different ideas proliferate on different mediums.
I do strongly recommend checking out some of the Freakonomics podcasts[2] and blog posts that involve Thaler. Extremely interesting and useful across many disciplines!
[1] http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/102715/richar...
Fun thought experiment: What would you do differently if you were to actually set up a front operation solely for the gathering of password/email credentials from unsuspecting users? Would you make it stupid simple for people to hack such as 000webhost? Thereby dodging blame, or would you just leak the data in secret in obfuscated chunks so as not to give away the source?