177 karma · joined December 16, 2015
These studies are flawed. They are based on the person telling the truth about their drug usage.
"Do we call those who grew and sold pot to feed their families entrepreneurs, are they idolized in think pieces?"
What about the people that sell guns to feed their families?
"The entire industry has been whitewashed and is still prey to the same racist fears that spurred its prohibition in the first place."
You must be smoking weed, because this is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Nobody is still attributing weed to only non-whites.
Look at how weed is characterized in movies and TV: white, dopey, college kids.
Without the US, the world would be fucked.
This will only create a fractured Internet and make it difficult for small startups to survive.
Very cool.
This will only create a fractured Internet and make it difficult for small startups to survive.
So, I'm doubtful.
This is just a continuation of the mentality that 'everyone should get a trophy' that started in the early 90s.
I still remember when I was in school (which is when all of this started) and we would be required to end kickball games early, so we could 'tie'.
If you can't handle being offended, you won't ever learn how to overcome it.
It's the same with bitcoin: With a credit card, I can pretty much dispute any charge and get my money back. Bitcoin is as risky as cash and I won't ever be able to get my money back if someone scams me.
I much prefer centralized solutions. Decentralized solutions might be good for people that can't ever get loans from a traditional bank (due to risk), but not so good for people loaning out the money.
I feel like many of bullied are not getting the therapy they truly need. Instead, they are becoming the bullies through sites like Twitter and big companies, schools, and now even governments are catering to their whims because nobody wants the bad press.
The same feminist group that twitter appointed to ther new free-speech censorship board has said some of the most horrific stuff about men. It’s beyond offensive, yet there are no bannings or accountability.
These groups see direct results and the power they have over individuals.
It really needs to stops or we will have no freedoms left and the mentally ill will be in charge of our lives.
I’ve seen it time and time again.. and then pushed out on social media to make the person that said it look like the bad guy...and since it’s usually one person against another, it’s impossible to defend.
This is why when the technology gets cheap enough, I will have a secret body cam on me at all times.
It’s already been proven many times that privacy no longer matters. Hell, a guy got an entire basketball team taken away from him based on private conversations.
The real problem, especially on a site like reddit, is that there is no winning.
Even if you have evidence and facts, if you go against groupthink, you will be shouted down, down voted, and ignored.
If you really piss the wrong person off, you will be bullied and could lose your job/career over it.
You tell someone something they don't want to hear, but need to hear, and you are now known as an asshole.
..and why would they strike? This group is probably in the top 10% of workers paid in the US.
I find it a little strange that a group that has the most power, money, and benefits even thinks about striking.
Billionaires are going 'missing' every month and the government can pretty much take over your business and take all of your money, for any reason.
To make any kind of money there, you need to pay huge bribes.
If I could, I would gladly replace my code base with Python.
Edit: It's pretty telling about the HN community when I simply post an honest opinion about my coding practices, and I am down voted into oblivion.
How are we ever going to actually progress when we can't even talk about things openly and honestly without getting the equivalent of shouted down.
Your feelings may be hurt, but I'm still not going to use Django until it improves.
I'm onto my second foreign language and you need rote memorization.
A good method for learning involves a combination of practical application+rote memorization. The problem is that in a classroom setting, if you just sit around talking, nobody will learn anything.
I also ran a language learning meetup group and tried multiple methods of study. Structured lessons with rote memorization plus practical application/speaking worked the best.
I also took Spanish in a US public school for 3 years and we had a combination of both. There is no magic. If you truly want to learn a foreign language, it takes tons of discipline and time.
Most people give up at any hint of difficulty or plateau at a very basic level.
Python isn't being assaulted on any front. We have always had multiple programming languages and some are better than others.
My issue is that we seem to have these fad languages, like Ruby-on-rails. I still remember when it was rammed down our throats on HN around ~2008 and you were instantly down voted if you wanted to objectively talk about it's pros and cons.
Now, all of the same people from that community (which I noticed, are mostly designers, not developers) have jumped ship and moved into Javascript frameworks like Ember.js and node.js.
PHP, while flawed and not cool anymore, is still one of the most popular languages.
Python will be around for a long time.
Unless they pull a Digg, this probably won't ever happen. Reddit actually got really lucky that Digg collapsed when it did, or we might even be using it today.
When you have more time than money, it makes sense. When your company gets big enough and you have more money than time, more proprietary/commercial software becomes an option.
To fund everything he wants, everyone will be taxed.
He said one time that he wants the upper tax bracket (federal) to be 56%. With state+federal+local taxes, this means your actual tax rate will be closer to 75% (just like in Norway, which is what he wants to emulate).
It's strange that so many people criticize Trump for discriminating against minorities, when Sanders is doing the same thing.
The 1% is a minority in this country and his main plat form is taking everything he possible can away from them and using them as a scapegoat for everyone's problems.
I call it 'economic fascism'.
If the company ever sells, they will definitely be looking at profit when it comes to valuation and if it's over-valued, VC gets paid out first.
I think many startup founders have it backwards: They have a good idea and they try to shoe-horn in a business model (that sometimes works).
Instead, come up with the business model first and then come up with a great idea around it. I've done this with my last two companies and I was profitable from day 1.