Even if it doesn't fully block, it makes stalking etc. more annoying.
2,052 karma · joined May 24, 2012
Even if it doesn't fully block, it makes stalking etc. more annoying.
For a project: MDN, they refactored the Web's JS documentation
On the other hand there was e.g. WannaCry in 2017 where 200,000 systems across 150 countries running Windows XP and other unsupported Windows Server versions had crypto miners installed. It shows that companies world-wide had trouble properly maintaining the life cycle of their systems. I think it's too easy to only accuse security vendors of quality problems.
I must admit I therefore was only vaguely aware of the site. (During "my time" Tom's Hardware was quite a thing but probably they cater mostly to overclockers and gamers)
Would be nice to see a renaissance of DIY computing though. MacBooks do become a little bit boring :) On the other hand I do run a small homelab by now
I don't think though there is unbiased news. Generally a classic recommendation has been to read across multiple sources.
There surely is actual engineering but it's scattered unevenly across companies. It's funny that Crowdstrike did fuzz their code but didn't even check for correct arity. I think that the Cybersecurity industry isn't such a strong adopter of sophisticated engineering techniques as for instance in Web development where new testing techniques evolve every few years.
I think one massive difference between CS and AV is also, you don't expect a human to be in the loop because it would be too expensive. Nor would it be feasible for consumer software because of privacy.
Also even within this small niche, the solutions are very heterogeneous and make little sense for single boxes - in fact may even be designed to run on a network level.
The title seems a bit misleading
edit: personally I think though that the company should take responsibility and make sure the employee either gets ramped up or a very smooth exit financially since the application probably meant he missed other options