1 karma · joined March 24, 2022
This doesn't have to be a R vs D issue.
The 'good-old-boys' are generally very happy with this and love to see new people of all backgrounds take the first steps toward citizen ownership of firearms. While there may be other disagreements on a political level, those barriers seem to be forgotten when people of good will help each-other out.
If we are going to be consistent on what a service is, and what speech is allowed on a service, this could get really interesting.
I am however uncomfortable with the idea that the state can compell an individual with incentives or the implied threat of travel curtailment to accept any medication.
Especially when those of us who do not want to get Covid-19 can get the vaccine and leave the others to their choice.
While the "slippery slope" is a logical fallacy, it's also an observation that often rings true.
I trust my sketchy neighbor with a gun much more than I trust the government with a gun.
Neither tactic is exclusive to the left or right certainly.
So for my - "No TV" is a easy way to express "I'm trying to maintain a ballance between living a vigorous life and consuming meaningful media"
And that's ok. When I work, I also provide value for others and they give me valuable things in return - like money for food.
You probably won’t die but you’ll be quite miserable. Apparently, once a gourd starts not breeding true, it can revert to a form with way too much bitterness - we humans have trouble with the chemical and get quite sick.
There should have been a label on the computer near the keyboard jack written by the people who knew about the problem.
If you didnt make a label afterwards yourself, the next keyboard-based outage would be your fault :)
As I understand it, marking your check "paid in full" combined with the cover letter is what potentially worked for you. Simply writing "paid in full" on the check generally isn't sufficient.
More info form real attorneys (unlike me)
https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/consumer-protection/banki...
-Lean Trotsky (paraphrased)
May I have that courage if needed.
Any idea on if directing guests to move randomly would work as well as directing them to move in patterns?
It seems we're using the 'hey-everybody-move' as a buffer to accommodate new guests.
Two questions:
Is it ok to think because there's an infinite amount of moving, this buffer is infinitely large?
Why can't we tell guests to just keep moving to random rooms? Would that also solve the problem? If you say no - random moves don't work - then I would propose that some of those random moves would fall into the outcomes of Hilbert's formula. Is that not sufficient?
It's also why the deceiver focused on Eve first - if she fell, Adam would surly follow.
https://home.ubalt.edu/NTYGFIT/ai_03_illuminating_love/ai_03...