benevol

Basically, we "simply" need the "Next-gen Bitcoin" - userfriendly, fast, lean in resources.

There are several new energy sources about to "come online". It's just that mainstream does suppress the information about those.

Google has become a major force of censorship. Twitter (under Elon Musk) is now opposed to that. That should explain what you experience.

By that logic, we'd need to make knives illegal, because people get stabbed to death every day somewhere.

Conclusions and Relevance:

Study results suggest that estimates of long-term exposure to multiple air pollutants was associated with increased risk of depression and anxiety. [...]

It's the usual "bait-and-switch" strategy, isn't it.

Make something good. Dominate the market. Increase economic pressure.

Only 1 way for to counter: Leave and let others know what you're using instead, and why.

No it does not. I'm saying the problem is much bigger than one country. And it's horrifying to observe how people don't realize what it means for them, for everything actually.

Might it be time to introduce financial bounties?

The wealth gap is continually being increased all over the world, though.

Energy with magnetics: https://www.KryonEngine.org

It's not only about hosting across multiple providers for the sake of diversifying that risk.

It's an unhealthy situation to be fully dependent on 1 single provider. It creates monopolies (instead of diversity and choice) which means less freedom, and/or more corruption and unhealthy conditions for all involved.

It looks like Ruby on Jets makes you 100% dependent on 1 company: AWS/Amazon; not an evolution I'd welcome.

And for reference, the gold standard, Devise: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise

Well, nice work. But poor authors...

Yes, immune systems all over the world have been weakened recently (you may or may not want to "speculate" as to the source of this), which is what explains what you perceive.

Ever tried Elles-Dee?

There's another "hack": Skip the injections, which saves your immune system.

> Worse, this isn’t even intentional.

Of course it is intentional. It's about manipulating the population. It's simply about the control of the people.

Britain? All major media outlets and social network platforms worldwide now have established censorship as "the new normal".

The only mainstream platform now setting itself up to become the exception to this is the one platform that since a few weeks gets consistently attacked by the establishment: Twitter.

Another approach is to simply go with a donation system. Lower purchasing power automatically leads to lower contribution.

Bonus: You don't need to worry about/collect/pay VAT in God-knows-how-many-different-countries around the world.

There's no need to insult others.

You'll understand over time.

For those of you who want to know what's currently going on, here are the names of the main publicly known contactees (people on Earth who publicly report that/how they maintain some form of contact to extra-terrestrials):

- Alex Collier

- Elena Danaan

- Marina Jacobi

- Dr. Michael Salla (no known direct contact, but excellent analyzing/reporting)

You'll want to check out their YT/rumble channels, websites, books (especially Elena Danaan's last 2-3).

The first question has always been the same:

What does the pharmaceutical industry need?

> If there were intelligent beings elsewhere in the universe

Wow some people still think we're alone. Wow. Just, wow.

> Switzerland doesn't have evoting.

And given what they show off, they should abstain from it for the next 1000 years.

I second the non-Amazon approach. We should make it a point to put our money where our mouth is.

This makes no sense. When governments go after their targets, they gather all they can as soon as they define them as targets.

Twitter, on the other hand, is known to be a massive censor, just like Youtube/Google.

This sounds like "Nutella - without the chocolate flavor".

But making big pharma insanely rich - once again.

> Also, respect the team. Maybe they aren't doing what you would, but they are keeping this beast alive, and probably have invaluable knowledge of how to do so. Don't come in pushing for change...

Yes, 3 people creating a revenue of $20 million/year is impressive.

But what if 1, let alone 2 of them quit and/or fall ill? That's way too much risk for this type of revenue.

If a new team member needs a year to just understand how the code is organized, then a well structured and documented rewrite certainly is necessary.

Literally all my social contacts have left FB for quite a while already, myself included. I'm surprised people still talk about this.