2,090 karma · joined February 27, 2011
the blog post in question is written by steve novella, who also produces _the skeptics guide to the universe_, a fairly popular science and skepticism podcast. it reads like more than just a "restatement of an MIT press release" to me. i don't love the entirety of the message but it's not just a summary of the paper or a summary of the summary of the paper.
https://github.com/beardicus/awesome-plotters
in case you find this stuff as fun as i do.
push what crap? the existence of gay people? why is it "pushing" something to more fully represent reality in our media? why should movies continue to pretend that gay people don't exist just because some parents refuse to teach their children about totally normal things?
I'd suggest reading Steven Novella's response at least:
https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/john-horgan-is...
could you compare and contrast replicad to JSCAD (https://openjscad.xyz)?
the examples in your docs are quite sluggish to load in Safari, but the workbench is very snappy!
After reading this way back in 2015 I decided to give it a try for a not-code-related task: downloading a book from the internet archive, copying out all the images, and running some adjustments and conversions on them with ImageMagick:
https://github.com/beardicus/bk-fig-phillips
It was fairly ridiculous but works well and I learned a lot.
what does "large enough to matter" even mean here? plenty of folks run single-user instances with no issues.
I don't love some of the changes with 1Password 8, but Electron has nothing to do with it.
https://www.alejandraquetzalli.com/book-designing-developer-...
it might be a little more on the practical "nuts and bolts" side of things vs. "how do i write well", but it covers lots of areas that always seem to come up when producing documentation for developers.
it feels all too common for folks to rage against bloaty interfaces (i agree, they're terrible!) but swing wildly back towards clunky browser-default randomness. you can have a consistent, polished interface without javascript and tons of images!
one thing w/ sourcehut that i find adds confusion is their choice to make their various services (source vs tickets vs mailing lists) completely separate apps. start on this page:
https://sr.ht/~martijnbraam/photoflow/
when you click on the "source" tab what do you expect will happen? i expect i'll go to a page with a source tree, listing files and directories. i also expect that i'll now be on the "source" tab at the new page, and will have the option to click back to the "summary" tab or any of the others that i currently see.
instead, you're taken to basically the same exact summary page (displaying README content) but with some git commit info on top. the highlighted tab is now... SUMMARY, AGAIN and there's a completely different tab set available to you. there is no way to click anywhere to get back to the previous version of the summary page and explore that tab group further.
i'm sure this makes sense to some folks (and they'll explain why i'm wrong below), but to me it feels like a cohesive user experience is not being prioritized here, and that's something i value ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1 question: are the docs in a repo anywhere? i don’t see them in the main repo (i might just be missing them somehow) or anywhere in the org. if they are public somewhere would you be open to a docs polishing PR?
i'm sure rants are cathartic for the writer, but i rarely find them compelling.
I don't particularly _want_ another login, but I also don't cherish the thought of losing access to Service A because of the actions of Service B.