483 karma · joined January 24, 2009
DDG is similarly self-effacing: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=search
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=850485
Coincidence that I should see this; I'm not really active on HN anymore, and just happened to click.
Those are exactly the words I've been looking for to describe my boss.
"as a compliment to this paper" --> complement
"no higher complement." --> compliment
Thanks for a cool post.
phpbb and topic view are returning error pages for me (on latest ff, cookies enabled).
Another way I'm reliably getting an error page is adding parameter &first=201, e.g. http://www.bing.com/search?q=stuff&first=201
This is the paging parameter, indicating you're at the 20th screen of results.
I heard Khan say recently on the Colbert Report that he read the Wikipedia article on the French Revolution as his source before making his video on the subject.
That's fine for his purposes, but somewhere up the information food chain someone must actually read the sources, weigh them, interpret, compare, and do all the other work of understanding and transmitting history. It's hard to imagine that those 'educated' by Khan can take up this work, or if they do, that by the time they become competent, they will regard his videos as anything other than inconsequential in their effort.
However, I do think it's overblown to say that Khan is any more dangerous than Cliff's notes or similar supposed shortcut to education. And I suspect his math and finance videos might be quite good, based on the response, and on the fact that he actually spent time in school learning math and finance. (But I haven't watched them.)
A similar theme (modern communication technology prefigured in earlier practices) can be found in Victorian Internet, by Tom Standage.
And when I temporarily want something bigger, I use Ctrl + scroll-up (Mac).
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%...
Whether it's ironic or not is hard to say. It doesn't really sound like it. First he urges a boy to become skilled in war, then he pictures the boy's fiancee begging him not to fight against the enemy's star fighter -- a lion of a warrior. Then the poet says, "it is sweet and fitting to die on behalf of one's country," and goes on the describe the heroic qualities of personified Virtue in face of opposition.
Horace did claim to have himself thrown away his shield and fled from battle when in the service of the republican cause (the side of Brutus) after the death of Caesar. But he's also picking up on a theme used by early Greek poets, like Alcaeus, so it's questionable how much of this confession is literary trope and how much is historical evidence. Furthermore, Horace had been fighting on the losing side, and he later found it necessary to receive pardon from the victor Octavian (aka Augustus), so better to sound like he supported the republicans only half-heartedly. On the other hand, it might well still be true that he ditched his shield and ran.
The poem dates from after his military experience, and belongs to a collection of poems called the 'Roman Odes' that celebrate Rome and the emperor Augustus.
I think that's mostly correct, but it's been a while since I studied these things.
"I don’t work that many hours a day." "I always went home at night, and didn’t work in the evening," she said. "I always found that downtime to be really useful."