611 karma · joined May 5, 2015
that seems like an unapologetically unacademic assertion used to support someone's underlying personal problems on aging, change, and mortality.
the experiment is over.
I have spiral top ones for notes of me thinking/remembering/wanting to reenforce for later type notepad with a constant pen that go lots of places with me. And graph paper-y notepads/notebooks to help me work on my penmanship and handwriting my thoughts. And rough papered oversized ones that I like to doodle on with sloppy pens.
I think cheap ones can be great. But cheap doesn't need to be everything.
And I haven't had a facebook account for me to edit since then. I'm glad some people saw levity, but to me it just seemed dour.
https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-...
... illustrates the fallacy of the Peter Principle.
The proletariat can be taught to take their class problems out on the customers. I assume that the third party delivery companies' leadership even encourage their drivers to take out their class frustrations on customers that complain about problems.
can there be anything so human ?
Wear a helmet. Your skull doesn't care about this study.
And titles like could lead to people to thinking that they won't need one. Which is unsafe for cyclists.
can you imagine hiring a production assistant that gave everything you asked them to do to a corporate competitor ?
Why would I want to do that with my life and Amazon and Apple ?
Humans do not own VR anything.
bless their hearts and billy-bookcases but they have never moved me on much else.
and i don't need my home-appliance obsolescence bar to descend even further towards flat-pack territory.
But I am not going to live with losing power a dozen times a year for up to a day at a time because a corporation wants my life to be the tip of the misery spear instead of their profit margins taking a hit.