But I have to push back?
Just end middle management and the issue from that article suddenly vanishes.
19 karma · joined June 30, 2019
But I have to push back?
Just end middle management and the issue from that article suddenly vanishes.
No, it is not an issue that they might „forget“ how to get this information from a book in a public library.
No, it is not an issue that they might „forget“ how to search for the information in a book from a public library.
[1] https://www-heute-at.translate.goog/s/-oida-ist-strafbar-wei... [2] https://fm4-orf-at.translate.goog/stories/3001181/?_x_tr_sl=... [3] https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/glawisc...
But it can be browsed anyway: https://guthib.com/.git/logs/refs/heads/master
I don't think a Turingtest (any form of conversation) can proof that either side is sentient.
Never got any response. Should I assume applying again is futile?
""" kein Verstoß gegen das Gesichtsverhüllungsverbot vor:
Mund- und Nasen-Schutzmasken, Atemschutzmasken; Gesichtsverhüllung zum Schutz vor Frost """
Roughly translates to:
""" It is no violation of the ban on face covering:
Mouth and nose protective masks, respiratory masks; Face covering to protect against frost """
Source[1] https://www.oesterreich.gv.at/themen/leben_in_oesterreich/au...