austhrow743

I believe that’s what pushed them over the edge on booting stormfront.

Probably a good idea to not claim affiliation with cloudflare without permission.

If there’s an alternative where being liked is an option then being rejected is often better than being disliked and tolerated.

You’re talking about an event where thousands of people are being flown around so they can do the activity they do every day but in a different location.

Of course no one involved cares about environmental impact.

Do you throw out things you already own when you see that an alternative has become cheaper than what you paid?

This would make sense as the answer if there were sky high prices for time sensitive things but much lower for things that don't need to be done right now.

My impression of US health care is everything involving a hospital being expensive.

Aren’t those things the point of the app?

If your complaint is that she was a fine CFO but a terrible CEO then i can hardly see her going back to a CFO role as failing upwards.

People updating their wills is the good alternative they're advocating.

Yes

As an individual sure. As a collective that constantly hires, you want your outward espoused values to be as close to your actual ones as you can get them without causing huge negative PR.

You just file in the country you were hired in and illegally work on tourism visas in the others.

It’s bad and unreasonable to link to deep web content on a different site.

That's a good reason to think it wasn't Ukraine not that it was.

They're in open war with Russia, are openly attacking their resource infrastructure, and are frequently posting excellent high quality footage of it.

Taking out the gas pipeline and then not using the attack for propaganda doesn't fit either their situation or their actions.

They weren't at the time.

I would think for most people the goal is some combination of spending less money on gadgets and less environmental impact from gadgets, with repairability just being a means to that end. In which case I would think the commenters proposed suggestion is more direct not less.

How did you know the $250 price didn't already account for the fact that Nvidia has at least a years worth of back orders to fill?

Apple was a far smaller, less significant company in 2001. Much less chance that someone would go to the effort to make a fake employee 10 badge back then.

Transfer payments, rent, dividends would provide income. People would then use it to buy things just like they do now.

If you're one of the last on board they sometimes try to take your bag away from you.

Local reuse non profit sounds like a rich yuppie thing. Us poors use Facebook marketplace to get our used appliances.

It's impossible for doctors and nurses to pass on everything they know about a patient during shift changes, which can be seen in the form of spikes in deaths and other bad outcomes right after care is handed over to a new team. Hence why they tend to do longer shifts.

That effect is eventually balanced out by exhaustion, sleep deprivation, etc taking the same toll they do on everyone. Theoretically If you could reduce the impact of sleep deprivation, we could push shift lengths further, reduce the amount of turnover in carers a patient sees even more, and receive even further benefits in health outcomes.

>If true, this is so, so, so irresponsible. Tell people that you don't know the answer! The control could easily be better than the drug! Don't give them false hope!

I don't think what you want is compatible with early stage trials.

Them not knowing the answer is well established before any conversation takes place. It's the whole point. OP isn't looking at trials that are close to being approved. They're hunting around for anything that might do anything. The super experimental stuff.

People generally vote for things that benefit them.

People who have a large portion of their wealth in housing, and even more so those who have used debt to take an extremely leveraged position on housing, benefit from increases in housing prices and lose out on decreases.

Having a significant amount of voters be in the above position is to make effective government action to reduce housing prices impossible.

So with that in mind, if institutional investors are disincentivised from investing in housing, which group is supposed to take their place?

The tweet is ffmpeg saying they offered Microsoft a support contract. I'm not sure you could have a better source contradicting that. Still a nothing burger tweet.

The more disregard a company has for intellectual property rights, the more data they can use.

Google had far more to lose from a "copyright? lol" approach than OpenAI did.

And they listed the number of expansions.

Why would it not?

They provide there being someone to rent from.

How are you using copilot if you're not coding?

By moving manufacturing off world.