654 karma · joined September 22, 2011
His work has directly shaped how many distributed systems reach consensus. Including recent projects like Solana. Also check out VDF and proof of history.
Specifically, do scientists believe the next breakthroughs will come from humanity or are we waiting for AI at this point?
Perhaps something to think about when writing code. It’s not always enough to know what it’s doing. Leave a comment with the why :)
And a live WASM demo if you’re into that: https://zfedoran.github.io/go-wfc-algorithm/
For example, mass effect without the 4 pre-canned options during each dialogue.
Before even considering something like this I’d want to see a style guide and clear definition of where code should live. Frameworks like React do that well. I can expect a random React dev to mostly do similar things.
However, can we take a moment to acknowledge how biased the crowd here is against blockchain? I know you’re tired of the buzzwords, but the other side is also tired of the hostility towards there maybe being something useful on the chain.
As the author has pointed out, things have evolved substantially over the last year and it deserves open and fair discussion.
Many complicated research papers have had no issues describing their models at a high level. This should be no different.
Anyone have thoughts on how to make projects like this more sustainable?