archonis

What a user insulting horrible bad faith attempt at a hot take on the issue.

Hard to take this self proclaimed cyberethnographer seriously.

Capitalized first letter is not percieved by the majority of people as shouting.

Does mobile safai render the entire name in all caps when the first letter is capitalized?

It feels good to model the future that way, but seems incredibly unlikely there will be consequences for those people.

...and they're promoting it by referencing said movies.

It fails the task as often as not on large East Coast highways. Not nearly as bad on the West Coast.

>> And there's lots of evidence that we've hit a million unlikely goalposts.

What makes them unlikely?

Great satire, but how are you going to prevent some UX person at Apple from thinking this is good idea?

What's your sample size?

Please educate yourself about basic biological taxonomy before you accidentally and publically position yourself as a practitioner and champion of flawed race science.

Everyone is a believer.

What exactly do you believe and why should anyone accomodate it?

>> Because I assume that agents work better with a filesystem to grovel

What the what now?

It requires trivial effort to search for prior art before naming something.

OP: Worth doing if you'd like others to invest time lookong at your project.

Anna's Archive merely indexes copyrighted content. It doesn't host.

PR only cares that the company is percieved as unstoppable & inevitable.

If their PR teams did have a response to these actions, it would be something to the effect of:

"would you rather china destroy all the books and gatekeep the knowledge?"

Don't forget size. Didn't reasonably fit in any non coat/jacket pocket.

Worked on initial load on chrome. After refreshing page to attempt to undo settings, I get an overlay:

"This visualization requires WebGL2. Try a current Chrome, Edge, Firefox, or Safari browser with hardware acceleration enabled"

Third reload, works fine.

Separate of the above observation:

Nice work.

Poor analogy striving for novelty achieves torture.

Processing analytics is very different than processing mission critical api endpoints. No response required.

Permanant vacation is great for an individual. I'd love one.

However, for our species, extinction follows domestication.

A good mother doesn't raise children to be dependent upon her for all their needs.

For this to actually work in a way that benefits our species, humans will need to become something else/next through their interaction with the technology.

Looks like it was made by a time traveler with jetlag.

The Gell-Mann amnesia effect also applies to the majority of translations.

>> It is hard to believe that only a few years ago the CEO of Twitter had to apologize for buying a sandwich from Chick-fil-A. That being replaced by a political regime that is openly racist, corrupt, is an insane extreme no one could’ve predicted.

Hard to engage beyond this when the looming pendulum swing was blindingly apparant to anyone observing the culture war from any reasonable distance.

>> Mr. Petersson and Mr. Backlund said they thought Luna would eventually get smarter and more business-savvy

How are we supposed to take these "labs" seriously when they clearly don't understand how the technology works at a rudimentary level?

The product concept really does need to exist in this world.

I just don't think the folks who have taken 50k preorders over the last 20 years and have yet to fulfill one are going succeed.

Are people still falling for Aptera's nonsense?

There is no why in the article, only what.

Hard to take any article on this subect seriously when the author can't conceive of (and argue against the solution of) centrifugal force used for artificial gravity.

Arguments in favor of not destroying our home planet are a good thing, but the article is shallow enough to hurt the author's cause.

Axios has lost a lot of credibility as of late. Seems like they're quite willing to journalism wash anything the current dministration tells them.

I guess one man's quirk is another man's feature. (or vice-versa)