Amusingly, from the PDF:
> WHAT WE ARE NOT SAYING:
> NIST intentionally put a back door in this PRNG
:)
641 karma · joined August 22, 2011
Amusingly, from the PDF:
> WHAT WE ARE NOT SAYING:
> NIST intentionally put a back door in this PRNG
:)
I don't know if Tor considers itself hard to compile, but they recently announced the intent to avoid this issue through deterministic builds[1], so it was interesting to see this mentioned here for TrueCrypt.
[1]: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/deterministic-builds-part-o...
netcat's cool, but the post could've gone a bit further. If it's an intro "how to do this", maybe explain the moving parts for beginners?
But the environment matters a lot less than the fact that when I get home from work—which is a two hour commute each way (sorry, I can’t afford to live in downtown San Francisco)—I just feel like being mentally incapacitated. Occasionally I have a little spark of brilliance (relative, not absolute) that motivates me to write a short bit of code, but the code is never more than one or two hundred lines. It usually consists of some little trick.
That is: you cannot fight your day-to-day work — long-term — by working on your own stuff, when you get home after already spending 6-7 hours working and thinking in a particular way. The author tagged it "sad" for a reason.
Doesn't help if you use GitHub for issues, of course, but hey!
you <--> (X <--> Y)
If you push to and pull from X, and X should be unavailable, automatically start using Y. When X is pushed to, check with Y first to keep in sync. There are ways to push to multiple remotes by defining multiple remote URLs, but then it's a harder problem of dealing with downtime.[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_for_hire
[2]: http://answers.onstartups.com/questions/19422/if-im-working-...
Jekyll, which it is similar to, had stagnated by the time I'd first put it up on GitHub, but it's probably closer in "philosophy" to Statamic[2].
[1]: https://github.com/aprescott/serif
[2]: http://statamic.com/
yes 'yes yes&' | shWhat's the reasoning behind a legal minimum? Why prevent a 1% fee?
If you want to read about what I've learned about the software business, leadership, and team-building, follow me on Twitter.
This is dependent on the exact election taking place. With the US presidential elections, my understanding is that a plurality of electoral college votes is not enough to win, you need an actual majority. In the event of a simple plurality win with no majority, the result is decided by the House of Representatives (which may itself be tied).
One aspect that I think can sometimes be troubling, is whether it's fine to just have a blog that is a miscellaneous collection of stuff covering a variety of topics, versus a blog that is about X, Y or Z at the outset. I guess this is just "the blogger trap" ( http://www.marco.org/2009/04/05/avoiding-the-blogger-trap ), but I get the impression that a blog for a specific subject would have a better reception, versus "I'm just going to write about whatever" which might have less reliability, in a sense.
Do you suggest it be a publicly readable "something" that gets blogged, or does it not matter if it's only for yourself, in your view?