767 karma · joined April 28, 2021
A part of the general public is only whipped into a frenzy against these measures by vested interests.
When large established companies complain about productivity and lack of employee commitment, the answer seems very obvious to me... Swap platitudes, certificates of recognition and motivational speeches with tangible financial incentives.
If the executive wants everyone to come into the office 5 days a week, then offer a 25%+ pay rise and watch people flood in
There is a risk that the borrower won't repay the loan, and this is priced in to the interest rate being charged.
Yet the public doesn't generally consider these firms to be publicly funded organizations, despite taxpayer money being the primary revenue source for many of them.
Assuming this is true. What would the rate of our universe's expansion tell us about the black hole we are inside of? If matter were still falling into our black hole universe where would it show up from our perspective?
The intelligent, optimistic and genuinely good, helpful people who don't learn this (or refuse to compromise their good nature) end up burning out, getting performance managed or with PTSD
I wonder how long until there is a major incident that seriously impacts customers experience and/or business systems.
Sometimes it's actually frustration that things aren't going the way you want (and the next question is why is my way really better than the other?).
Sometimes it's someone else's mistake (and the next question is have I ever made a mistake?)
Then someone cuts in front of you in line and it could really matter (time pressure or opportunities missed) and that behaviour could be something you would never do to others. In that situation believe it's healthier to speak up, but there is much less risk of escalation, and a good chance of gaining allies around you if the message is delivered calmly rather than with anger.
If I ran a B2C sass, I wonder what I would consider appropriate. Maybe a quarterly update on new product features?
I haven't needed to hard block in a while, maybe the message is starting to get through!
One night I dreamed the solution, how obvious it was! Even now I still remember this experience when confronted with an intractable problem.
They are mapping ECG data to the 'big 5' personality traits, and neglected to mention how these traits were determined for each participant prior to measuring the model's predictive accuracy. Almost certainly these primary trait scores were determined through a questionnaire.
Does this have any more validity than the E-meter from Scientology?
From the paper:
>Traditionally, assessment for personality traits has relied heavily on self-reported questionnaires and behavioral observations. While these methods have proven valuable, they also introduce subjectivity and potential biases
Also, I'd say that manipulation of CSS classes and HTML elements with JS gives the developer quite a strong understanding of them.
Most of the public is aware of this, and will probably continue to accept it as long as the general standard of living doesn't fall to much.
From the blurb: "...Neanderthal Predation (NP) theory reveals that Neanderthals were 'apex' predators - who resided at the top of the food chain, and everything else - including humans - was their prey..."
https://www.amazon.com/Them-Us-Neanderthal-predation-created...