453 karma · joined December 22, 2019
It could have been a number of other reasons and you're attributing it to the wrong one.
This is, of course, one if the problems with current research as it wastes everyone's (yours, reviewers, ACs, etc) time. In particular, because you're not guaranteed practicable or actionable feedback and because you're increasing the time reviewers must review work (i.e., more papers to review as submissions are higher and quality lower).
What specifically do you want to draw researchers attention to? Can you give an example?
Your example above of "common working loops" and essentially think time around coding has been studied extensively previously. Before making recommendations, I want to first ensure we're on the same page.
Potential keywords (and conferences) are CSCW and CHI.
I'm not near my laptop, but it's two lines of code in the SSH config files and that's it.
Does anyone follow a similar pattern?
One addition: social mobility is possible in almost any class based society. So using one such example does not prove that class in USA==wealth.
So it's not a straw man, but rather that we're having different discussions.
>> The options are: cite him, slight him, or prove him wrong.
Again, are you a researcher? These are not the options. Also what even is "slight him" or "prove him wrong"? My comments above are about citation practices not this one researcher in particular.
>> I think he's made it clear that he won't accepts slights without a fight, so one can either show him where he's wrong, cite him as he plainly makes clear one should, or admit that he's being shut out for unscientific reasons.
There is nothing to fight about nor nothing to "prove". There are many reasons to cite an author and being the first to publish a paper many years ago about a topic does not automatically deem citation. That's not how science works. It's how (unfortunately) the academic churn of paper writing works at times.
FYI: it's not "unscientific" to not cite a paper. It's almost impossible to cite all relevant works, so the author of a paper selects the most relevant. Obviously this is biased and can become political (e.g., Schmidhuber), but flamming online about not being cited doesn't mean you must cite an author.
So no, he does not have to be cited just because.
How would that work for other schedulers? Also, if a server reboots that's quite bad all round anyway. Hopefully you'd be notified directly.
Besides, what if they are mixed race? Those who claim to have German ethnicity certainly could be other than white.
Quite a surprising take there @DeathArrow ...
I mean, really? It's a shell script wrapped as a package to gain traction. What has the state of the Dev world become, indeed ...
What makes you enjoy it more?
Else yes, a bit confusing.
That way, if they list one very high, perhaps they'll get an above average offer on the .com, then when they sell that, the same seller will buy the .Io for a cheaper price. Such as 10k.