The idea that university is job training just needs to go. The academic material may be relevant for work later on but it often isn't, and on the job there is way more to learn.
8 karma · joined July 15, 2014
The idea that university is job training just needs to go. The academic material may be relevant for work later on but it often isn't, and on the job there is way more to learn.
The activity that's happening in the brain but never reaches the level of motor activity (in people that are not disabled and/or impaired in some way) is problematic to interpret as it is difficult to control and may not even be properly regarded as intentional.
But, yeah. The agencies didn't really have much incentive to be skeptical of their models.
edit: I agree with your ninja edit.
Empirical evidence is experiential by definition - it can be material evidence if it relates to claims about matter, but it can also be evidence about other domains.
Ex. If God exists, then religious experience is empirical evidence of this. It is not probably not material evidence however.