The Downtown Project Suicides
recode.net
recode.net
The reality is that most entrepreneurs - those that do not have the pedigree to be handed huge checks from VC's - have everything on the line. To most, failure means that they and their families will suffer severely. People often start businesses because they have needs or responsibilities that are above their earning power at a regular job. When you combine those pressures with the high failure rate of startups, you get a high suicide rate. It's sad, but it's not a problem that is unique to the Downtown Project.
while it may make sense for established types of businesses - open a restaurant, your own consulting, etc... it doesn't make sense for innovation domain which is more close to gambling (1/36 roulette, 1/10 hi-tech startups). MS, Apple, Google, FB - were started by people in the "no-pressure" situation.
A person who is happy is not reading hundreds of books about happiness. And that person will also not become happy through doing that. Happiness is not something you can create externally. (Yes, if you're starving and homeless then having some money and material possessions would definitely make you happy. But we are talking about multimillionaires and billionaires here who are not in that situation.)
I think the entire downtown project has much less to do with creating some sort of startup utopia and more with something that Tony himself is seeking. But he won't find it outside of himself.
"A person who is good at software development is not reading hundreds of books about software development" doesn't strike me as true. People who are really good at something often spend far more effort to continue to improve than someone who is mediocre.
edit: I agree with your ninja edit.
To toot the counter culture horn, it's the pursuit of profit as the end-goal that makes the world a rotten place... ironically, does the pursuit of happiness as an end-goal have similar issues?
To rephrase: Like profits, happiness is a way to tell whether or not what you're doing is working, but it's not what you're doing.
● Being surrounded by happiness /or/ the expectation of happiness makes people feel behind, like losers, and makes them depressed.
● Depression is highest in 1st world countries.
Now, think about Las Vegas, it's a "celebratory / party" town. Lights, glamour, parties, fun times, gambling, excess, big business, big hotels. Its atmosphere only exaggerates the idea that "everyone is doing fine but you, you're a loser". Building a startup community there is probably not a good idea.
I do believe though that if it weren't for my knowledge of the project I wouldn't even know about the area. In fact, many locals I've met still don't know about Container Park. So, they do have some marketing to work on I guess.
http://downtowncontainerpark.com/events/
Also... a MASSIVE robotic fire breathing praying mantis.
What's not to love?
My next recommendation is Red Rock National Conservation Area.
The strip is just a the strip. YMMV.
http://dtlv.com/2014/09/30/downtown-project-layoffs-tony-hsi...
What I originally thought. http://www.pakg1.net/2011/05/problem-with-team-building-init...
When people think like this, I get really worried. Like companies that tout the "Sunday test". Would you come into the office just to hang out with that guy on a Sunday, for no other reason, just want to hang out? At work, masks come on for various personal reasons. Outside of work, masks come off for various personal reasons. Rare is the person who can be the same person in work and out of work. And for the same reason, rare is the person who can suffice with a support network only at work.
It's not omitted to fit the 80 character limit; the title with the word included is still underneath that.
It's not omitted because the article isn't about suicides; there's three of them discussed.
I submitted the link, and I could have sworn I just copied and pasted the full title it's running under at Re/code, which is "The Downtown Project Suicides: Can the Pursuit of Happiness Kill You?"
If I'm misremembering and the word wasn't in the submission, I apologize in advance. But if it was there, and someone took it out, that seems like it does a real disservice to the article by downplaying the gravity of what it's actually about. (I'd edit it myself to put it in, but it looks like my window for editing the submission has closed.)
Edit: My mistake; we'll put it back.
Edit 2: Now that this thread has subsided, there was another reason why I edited the title that way.
Ever since I read Cialdini's "Influence" I've been sensitive to the dismaying evidence that publishing suicides encourages some people to kill themselves. I felt uneasy having a title blaring the word "Suicides" about a tragic story—in the startup world, especially—on HN's front page. No doubt the Werther Effect is small, but this is a law-of-large-numbers situation, so I'd rather over-react than under-react.
If anyone happens to be having suicidal thoughts around here: please tell someone. If you don't have anyone to tell, tell me. My email is in my profile.
And the word "suicide" is much clearer than "kill you" -- which is so vague it sounds like it could be recreational drug overdose, for instance.
Sorry, but there isn't the slightest thing "baity" about it.
One of these implies an article about things that have actually happened, the other an article about things that might...
How about something like "The Downtown Project Suicides: The danger with pursuing happiness" or even just "The Downtown Project Suicides"
Remove an informative part of the title to leave the baity bit? Must be Hacker News!