134 karma · joined April 5, 2012
Wasn't dithering done before the encoding? I thought that was the reason he needed ordered dithering.
You were excited in 1996-Feb-29 when 5.002 was released?
Not everyone on hn is in their early twenties, i suppose. rtmpdump -r 'rtmp://cp262207.edgefcs.net/ondemand/techchannel/10385/videos/OW10002.Claude_Shannon-FL8_550x310_700K' -o Claude_Shannon_Demonstrates_Machine_Learning.flvedit: also, supporting windows is a lot of additional work
I feel nothing but disgust reading the comments cheering their lethal poisoning.
I believe it is very well possible (using the UEFI IP stack) to write a tiny and portable BIOS malware that loads hardware and OS probing code, filesystem drivers and OS specific payload from a c&c server.
Also i suspect that the checksums might be breakable, but i don't know which algorithms are used to calculate them.
http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/6043/were-no-str...
Of course this does not work if the checksum is calculated before the file is closed by your backdoored compiler.
Consider, for example, hooking all fclose function calls and testing on every call whether
* you have write permission on the file,
* its an object file,
* its in an architecture your exploit supports,
* it uses the fclose function (or the corresponding system call, if it is linked statically)
* and your exploit is not already present.
If those conditions are true, hook the fclose calls in the object file before actually closing it, otherwise just close it normally.
Removing all but the mov instruction from future iterations of
the x86 architecture would have many advantages: the instruc-
tion format would be greatly simplified, the expensive decode unit
would become much cheaper, and silicon currently used for com-
plex functional units could be repurposed as even more cache. As
long as someone else implements the compiler.
:DAppearently BBCs 'iPlayer' does support https streaming (for their iOS App), but only if you have an Apple signed client certificate.
:(