Show HN: See what words are trending on HN
hackernewstrends.herokuapp.com
hackernewstrends.herokuapp.com
Note that you can click on a word to get some of the posts it's mentioned in.
Edit: Also, a heads up -- it's running on a Heroku free dyno, and it's already feeling a little slow.
The price of Bitcoin is being driven by media and hype right now - deserved or undeserved, in the near term there WILL be a dip in that and the price will drop for no "good" reason. Keep an eye on that if you're looking for a peak at which to sell, or (maybe more importantly) a bottom at which to buy.
Exclude commonly trending words such as Google. It isn't trending if it's already huge.
I've got '[' and ']' for the last week, exclude these too.
EDIT: As a matter of fact something seems to be wrong if Google is classified as trending. There haven't been a big surge in posts about Google in the recent past. Either something is wrong, I am wrong or the algorithm is still training (e.g.: learning what is the normal rate of appearance of certain words)
When I was developing it I saw Google trending all the time. I think Google just comes up in conversation on HN very frequently.
I suppose I could remove Google it if it doesn't have meaning. But maybe it does. This is interesting: if Google stops trending, perhaps that's a canary signal that it's not relevant anymore.
In other words, frequency of occurrence is interesting, but statistically unlikely occurrences (more or less frequent than expected) is even more interesting.
Two minor things I noticed:
Currently, 7 is listed as tending now with seven mentions. Not that numbers trending could never be interesting e.g. if 600 were trending due to the discussion about the lowering of the prime gap [0], but 7 seems to be trending just because of submission titles.
Both [ and ] are tending in the past week. This seems to be due to submission titles tagged with e.g. [video], [pdf], [<year>].
It's true that there is a bit of noise. I think it's pretty good overall though. There is a filter list of 866 words that greatly improved the results after I implemented it.
Is HN all about the money?
EDIT: also, very neat work! However, you should consider excluding "]" and "[" from the list.
I just added [ and ] to the filter list.
Does that mean that someone just said "ockhams" twice?
I would be great to read about your project more.
I could open source it if you really want to take a look.