YellowStuDregg

I see it frequently used in the context of Podemos or Syriza

So is market harm

"Some courts have held this factor to be the most important in the analysis."

https://ilt.eff.org/Copyright__Fair_Use.html#Market_Harm

Could people feel dismissive towards your opinion because it sounds like confabulation, rather than a carefully reasoned argument based on data that could spawn a good faith discussion?

> What's interesting to me

Shower thought, then

> This is probably going to get downvoted to oblivion, because nobody wants to confront the idea that...

Alright you win!

the people shooting up gay night clubs?

A quick google search gives us plenty of past published projections and how they fared:

https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-m...

You can also watch Carl Sagan break it down in front of congress back in 1985 for just 15 minutes of your time

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp-WiNXH6hI

Also see this paper on the rise and fall of rationality in language (previously shared on HN)

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2107848118

They do use native widgets:

https://toga.readthedocs.io/en/latest/background/philosophy....

Looks like the original author uploaded the source recently:

https://github.com/iaddis/SNESticle

Not to give credence to the overall article, but that part seems legit:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/12659

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmfa... (p10#20)