- Long term vs short term
- different rates
- state capital gains taxes
In this case, with the receiver being a CA resident, he pays almost certainly more than 50% in taxes on this bounty.
2,781 karma · joined December 3, 2014
- Long term vs short term
- different rates
- state capital gains taxes
In this case, with the receiver being a CA resident, he pays almost certainly more than 50% in taxes on this bounty.
I just don’t understand why Python thinks it necessary to define global functions for something that naturally should exist as a method.
And, of course, there’s no way to know up front when to use a global function vs when to use a method.
So for, not a single phantom break.
So I wonder what it is that makes it not happen for me? Probably half of those miles are in the evening, so that might be a partial explanation. Maybe the direction from which the sun is coming?
My other colleague’s Tesla had multiple major issues, including one that requires an engine to be replaced.
They both still bought a new Tesla after that, and so did I, because they’re just so fun to drive, but your anecdotal evidence doesn’t disprove a fact about a 10% failure rate.
One thing that strikes me is how it evolves with new features. Not just higher level libraries, but also more fundamental, low level stuff, such as virtual memory, standard memory models, c++ libraries, new compilers, communication with other GPUs, launching dependent kernels, etc.
At their core, OpenCL and CUDA both enable running parallel computing algorithms on a GPU, but CUDA strikes me as much more advanced in terms of peripheral features.
Every few years, I think about writing a CUDA program (it never actually happens), and investigate how to do things, and it’s interesting how the old ways of doing things has been superseded by better ways.
None of this should be surprising. As I understand it, OpenCL has been put on life support by the industry in general for years now.
I don’t think it’s sad at all, it’s a fun reminder about how we function.
So, yeah, different expectations.
But there are multiple reasons why money is a bigger focus:
- less long term job security. And that lower paid fulfilling job might very well be less secure too. I want to secure my financials as quickly as possible.
- insane cost of housing. A family sized 1800 sqft house with a garden now routinely sells for $3M in my neighborhood. You’re looking at $120k per year in mortgage payments and another $40k in property taxes. That’s after a $750k downpayment.
- the cost of higher education for kids.
- the general cost of living.
We could all move to the French Riviera, I guess, or vote for a better system that isn’t a hellscape for a significant segment of the population, but for an individual who’s forced to live in the current reality, money is a short term fix.
https://impossiblehq.com/impossible-foods-lawsuit-statement/
I don’t see the point in discussing lala land hypotheticals.
For a certain price, you can buy an Intel CPU with certain known features. For a higher price, you get more features.
This is a concept that’s used in many product classes. The fact that it’s also done for HW is just an irrelevant detail.
The fact that there's a pretty common way to value public companies doesn't mean that you can make a fortune with it, because it sweeps aside the importance of time.
Have you never heard of Keynes' classic "The markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent" ?
Compare that 50 GB/s of the M1 Max to 760 GB/s of an RTX 3080. Then check prices. Even after ridiculous scalping markups, the RTX 3080 will still be cheaper.
Somebody at a major chip company told me that they went looking for, and found, new customers after the automotive customers canceled their orders.
So not only did the car companies ordered more than before after they realized that demand was not dropping, even if demand for them had returned to what it used to be, the total demand from other customers is now higher too.
I use a MacBook trackpad to make diagrams, for 3D modeling using Blender and FreeCAD, to draw schematics and route PCBs with KiCAD, and whatever else you’d otherwise do with a mouse, and it just doesn’t get in the way.
Over the years, I’ve been forced to use work supplied top-end Thinkpads, HP, and Dell laptops and none come even close to even the trackpad of my long retired, lowly 2009 MacBook Air 11”.
I don’t really care whether I use macOS, Linux or Windows: they all run the same applications. I also don’t care about the price of a laptop: what does it matter that a tool that I use day in day out for years costs $1000 more?
I care that it’s usable.
MacBooks are usable for things I use them for. The other laptops are not.