Timshel

In a way it's worse since, you can't make plan to move if they become obsolete in 2 months but can you afford/survive waiting ...

I think the point is kind of moot.

I doubt they own any part of their manufacturing at the moment. Unless manufacturing already exists in the US (which I doubt here), I don't believe company this size has any chance to move manufacturing to the US

The GamerNexus video already mentioned elsewhere explore those issues: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W_mSOS1Qts.

I doubt he would have been paid to promote a competing service ..

https://mastodon.social/about does not appear to block mas.to.

As mentioned in the article it's just that if nobody is interested in your posts then they won't propagate.

> Crucially, the posts did not exist even if I visited the profile page of the account: even after weeks of daily posts

This means he did not even follow his own bot account, otherwise the posts would be visible ...

> then you feed gets dominated by that account, and you end up unsubscribing

Possible solution is to create a list with those accounts, remove them from the default feed and display them separately.

> Nontoxic social media isn’t possible.

I agree, but you can't ignore politics because in the end your definition of Toxicity is probably a direct reflection of your political positions.

And if current platform are so toxic I believe it's mainly by choice, be it an ideological or economical one.

Yes but before you reach this point you probably have a bit of time to start discussing with them ?

While limiting, it's not atrocious:

>You may use the software under this license only if (1) your company has less than 1 million USD (2024) total revenue in the prior tax year, and less than 10 million USD (2024) GMV (Gross Merchandise Value), or (2) you are a non-profit organization or government entity.

For AR they are linking an article which describe a way it could be beneficial: https://eyewiki.org/AR_Computers_To_Terminate_Eyestrain_And_... But I don’t believe it exists in any device ...

Cf >So by using a modified augmented reality glasses, humans can read at close range with both the ciliary and medial rectus muscles relaxed, and the eyes will never get tired.

As for VR no source ...

Start now with a forward from the old address. Might take multiple years before you are confortable deleting the old address.

Framework is selling the board as a stand alone: https://frame.work/fr/en/products/framework-desktop-mainboar...

Too bad there isn't a full PCIe (might not be enough bandwidth left) :(.

Not to attack OP but when I see comments like those I think we're fucked.

If even on HN peoples care so little for privacy it's no wonder Mozilla could not truly push the privacy angle and are forced to resort to IA crap ...

How is it still at 4.6 stars ??? On Firefox it dropped to 2.9 ...

For the share issue we are already there, with Firefox+Linux so many websites started to just block, usually with chrome at least a captcha is still offered.

With the current board and directors and focus I don't see any ways Firefox will gain share in the future (or not any that I really care about), and I certainly have no interest to support the current goals ...

For the privacy part Mozilla has been sitting on features like containers for years with no improvements. At this point I believe Mozilla ending might be better since it would shake things up ...

Hey, Not sure what you were left with once you removed metro stations but in the context of the original image the "gare" would be: https://www.sncf-connect.com/gares/paris .

And people would probably often forget Paris Bercy ^^.

For those wondering the original image was speaking of "Gare" which are well-defined: https://www.sncf-connect.com/gares/paris

While it's relatively trivial to run something like:

  fetch(new Request("https://kagi.com/search?q=test", { method: "GET", headers: new Headers({ "X-Kagi-PrivacyPass-Client": true })})).then((r) => console.log(r.headers.get("www-authenticate")))

A simple response in the body to something like <https://kagi.com/privacypass> would be easier to check.

And you answered someone else:

> It is also something anyone else could do to keep us honest :)

While true I believe for such a feature making it as easy as possible for your users to check independently is just better.

Kind of as long as they can track you, it's good if others cannot.

In France there is a detailled report of a Tesla in a similar accident, it end up speeding over 100km/h and killed a cyclist.

What's interesting is that after a red light acceleration was initially inhibited (don't remember exactly why), driver pressed on the accelerator more and more up to almost 100% but the car was not speeding up much.

Then when inhibition was lifted the car basically started a quarter mile and the driver was overwhelmed and just steered the car without lifting the accelerator until it crashed :(.

Edit: In this accident too, the driver thought he tried to stop but with no effect. AEBS was triggered, but the driver missed the notification and just accelerated more when the car started slowing down. A residual pressure in the breaking system meant that acceleration was initially limited.

The full report: https://www.bea-tt.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/bea...

I would bet on "Normalization of deviance", such a close altitude separation should probably just not exists (default is 1000ft).

If it had become a norm then a second controller would probably not change anything.

Yeah let's wait until more "AI that tries to infer people’s emotions at work or school." or "AI that manipulates a person’s decisions subliminally or deceptively." are deployed and start spamming crap before making any regulation ...

Yes as far as I understand it's a big issue. Since you can only vouch once it's dead and usually too late. Additionnaly you might loose the ability to vouch ...

Probably as much as possible. Those are expensive teams to maintain and deploiment is probably not much compared to it. If you are cynical you could see it as just training for an important case.

There is a page with the details of what they retrieve/store: https://www.helloquitx.com/How-is-your-personal-data-process...

They essentially rely on you sharing the follower.js/following.js file from your data dump.

It's a tool to help you stay in contact with your follower if you decide to leave Twitter. The decision is still up to you, the goal is to try to minimize the network effect which might prevent some people from leaving.

I fail to see the manipulation ...

It all depends on how true this statement is:

> “The sub claim changes in about 0.04% of logins from Log in with Google. For us, that's hundreds of users last week”.

I can't seem to find your citation from the add-on page.

Might be a placebo but YT appear more responsive with it on than off after a ctrl+f5.

Edit: appears to be in the reviews: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/chrome-mask/r...

> Currently the main attack facing Firefox is coming from advertising companies such as YouTube.

While I agree; between an up-to-date uBlock Origin and https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/chrome-mask YT is quite usable.

Long term I'm more worried by Mozilla leadership than Google shenanigans.

I don't believe it supports adding parity drives only data drives.

Many would not open an account on truth social, since Twitter/X is turning into it seems logical to encourage/help people leaving.