442 karma · joined October 1, 2019
Why is this?
The argument isn't that Manhattan is car-centric qua its people, the argument is that Manhattan is car-centric qua its infrastructure.
[1]: https://laeger.dk/media/mjpbsm2a/honorartabel-2023-januar.pd...
https://www.serverhunter.com/#query=product_type%3Adedicated...
1. The chance, weighted by amount, of a price hike/salary increase
2. The chance, weighted by amount, of a price decline/salary decrease.
As inflation is generally an upward trend, clearly no. 1 is more likely and thus the best bet.
It is a bad chart though. I was confused too.
And I, in turn, would be delighted not to work for you.
While at uni, I worked on a local fishing boat doing (amongst many things) hardware/software integration, and did some work on equipment communicating via NMEA. Very fun blast-to-the-past, didn't know the standard was used outside of marine environments.
If not your style, https://imgbb.com is also an option. More ads, though
But please do upload a picture. That would be interesting.
> Google is taking the unprecedented step of paying back users for all the games they bought on its cloud gaming platform.
Google _voluntarily_ refunded their customers. It's unheard of and was, frankly, extremely unexpected. Good for Google and good for Stadia customers.
So it really depends on if your threat model can handle others knowing that you're using Matrix. It most likely can.
Of course, malicious clients can ruin it for everyone else in the form of DoS attacks but that's clearly not happening here.
Doesn't even have to be a new hallucination, sometimes it's just the exact same wrong answer.
In rust, for example, it's possible to safely share data between threads without incurring costs of a garbage collector. Nim uses a different GC for each thread, so it naturally increases costs on a per-thread basis.
I feel comfortable telling you because most of your content isn't inflammatory, so I fear you might have been wrongly filtered out.
You have to make it probable, which is very different from proving. A rule favoring consumers, something like "there isn't an excess of scratches" is sufficient in most cases, where the alternative would require an excessive cost in further analysis (read: all electronics).
> If you import the component from outside the EU the law doesn't even apply, as you have formed a contract with a trader not bound by this law.
The seller is advertising _and_ shipping his product to the EU, therefor he is bound by its laws. He even features specific advise to EU consumers.
> But in this case it's all irrelevant because the item sold is basically a spare-part
This is just nonsense. It's sold direct to consumers, it's a consumer product.
Even if that's the case, that's not an issue of DRM, that's an issue of distribution.
It's also just flat out not true. Sure, some of the 4k HDR content might originate from PTP/BTN/scene/w.e., but it's readily available on e.g. RARBG.