118 karma · joined May 31, 2012
I tried to find pictures to verify my idea, but every head injury picture I found was of an athlete.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_states_of_the_Commonwea...
What I typically do is give "important" services unique, random passwords (bank, personal email, work email; things that can do damage), and use one of a set of passwords for everything else. If one password gets found, then maybe only my Reddit, Skype and a few forum accounts are compromised. This has the advantage that I use the unique password frequently enough to memorize them, and non-unique passwords are used in a few places which results in them also being used enough that they are memorized.
If the cracker was trying to brute force a password, then they would have to try every available character in every valid position. Unless I'm misunderstanding something, and n-length password would take a similar amount of time to guess as any other n-length password with the same restrictions. The cracker doesn't know going into it that I only have letters in my password, so he has to use any valid character.
Perhaps a more useful system would be one that would let websites enter their password restrictions and tell them how secure their users' password can be with those restrictions.
Of course, we haven't solved the "you must be in my X:XX" problem, but doesn't every meeting get I the way of flex time?
That one has bit me quite a few times...
I'm no psychologist, but I would guess that associating the scary images of STDs and the like directly with condoms and contraceptives in general would be more likely to cause people to form a negative opinion of condoms. What you want to do is advertise sex and condoms side-by-side, so that thoughts of sex trigger thoughts of condoms, rather than thoughts of condoms triggering thoughts of STDs and child-support. Positive reinforcement rewarding positive behaviour.
It's easy for us as men to feel welcome and comfortable in a group composed almost entirely of men, and I suppose it ends up being sort of self-fulfilling at that point to "keep women out", even if we don't all intend for that to happen. I know that walking into an interview and sitting across from 3 women scares me a little bit, but I can't even imagine how I would feel in an office full of women; definitely out of place.
TL;DR: Please stick with it! The best way to help the female students and interns to be more comfortable in the field is to get as close to a 50:50 gender split as possible.
These things are fantastically useful, all we need now are cheap monitors and you could definitely set up a (albeit somewhat weak) computer for the change in your piggy bank!
But what makes it "bad"? Everyone says it, but I don't think I've seen any solid arguments behind it. If it's just because you get a lot of less experienced developers using it (for the reasons mentioned in the article), then I fail to see how that is a flaw at all. If you're 12 years old and trying to get started with web development, then you're probably going to use Apache and PHP to do your first "Hello world".
In the grand scheme of things, there are very few websites that actually require a more robust back-end than PHP. Unless you're pulling in millions of hits, you don't have to worry about the inefficiencies of the language.