Historically the FCC hasn't care about modding radios, until people start doing illegal shit with them... like broadcasting FM on AM Airband freq's
3,124 karma · joined August 4, 2015
Historically the FCC hasn't care about modding radios, until people start doing illegal shit with them... like broadcasting FM on AM Airband freq's
Mentions that it's a basic scrambler. I doubt a $30 radio has a chip powerful enough for real-time (proper) encryption.
There are a lot more SOMETHINGhub sites that are not-porn (ex: scihub, github) than the one pornhub site.
While the Dexcom is "better" (than Freestyle Libre) in my opinion because the recent revision can talk directly to your phone continuously (the Libre only sends alerts, getting data requires you tapping phone to arm)... your insurance may cover only one or other. Either is way way better than nothing, but both are still a long way from automation.
While I'm not a fan of regulation, we should have some sort of optional transponder/beacon system that can be voluntarily registered. ADSB-like, which I know balloons can do...but true ADSB is expensive.
That way hobbits can continue doing their thing, the cost per balloon goes up by some minor amount, and we don't scramble jets and make national news constantly.
The QR option is nice, as long as it's just an option. A physical menu is, generally, much nicer to use. That being said, sometimes you want to go back and reference what you ordered, or other options (like for drinks) and ... the menus have all been taken away.
I question how much effect this would have over time. 8Hz would be a shockingly small amount of change to not have accidentally stumbled on to this being "better" hundreds of years ago. So I'd wager it's maybe something to do with the music sounds just enough "off" from normal that the mind becomes more engaged with the music.
Or... better yet, engage with these clearly VERY passionate customers. This is someone who not only bought your product but has donated hundreds or thousands of hours of their free time to making your product better. Better how? Because its works in a way your customers want that you don't otherwise offer. Instead of demanding take down, file a bug report with them to explain how the code is misbehaving. Bugs happen, maybe the developer didn't include an exponential fall off for outages. Whatever. Let them know and they'll probably fix it. Heck, you could use one of the in house developers to file a pull request to fix it yourself.
That's how you be the good guys. Instead of stomping on small projects of passionate customers, you engage with them. Make them even more a fan of your product, rather than a lifetime hater.
[1] https://www.home-assistant.io/blog/2023/11/06/removal-of-myq...
At the end of the day, the real story is that EV's are having teething problems in unusual cold conditions. It's still relatively new technology (on the scale of cars in general), and we need to learn how to handle these different scenarios properly. My grandparents in Northern Minnesota had an engine block heater that they'd leave plugged in anytime their ICE car (decades ago) was home. Why? Because it'd get so cold you couldn't start the car. But this wasn't laughed about on the news because it wasn't new. We as a society had learned how to deal with it and it wasn't a big deal. EV's will get there one day.
The TLDR is that when you tell them you want to cancel, you have 60 days to do so and during that time you'll have no egress fees. Makes sense.
Biggest problem though is... if you have a substantial amount of data or need to do a complex and seamless transition - this probably won't work for you. I would have to be on the DevOps team that's told to move a complicated and data-heavy application, and they only had 60 days to do so. Also the bulk of the data movement is, in my experience, one of the first steps of migration - not the last.
My hope is that, if nothing else, this will spur similar behaviors in other large cloud providers ::cough::aws::cough::.
Because they were trying to be forward-thinking and do the right thing, environmentally speaking.
> they are meant to be running a business!
By this logic we should still be using coal for all power or maybe crude oil. And kids should still be working in factories. Not everything is just about running a business. You can be a successful business and still make good choices for the world.
Also they got a LOT of EV's, I give them props for doing so... but rental cars should be a little more diverse of fleets. I realize it's easier to maintain a few types of vehicles, but that's not the business they are in. Additionally, Tesla is not yet the type of company that can readily support fleet purchasers. It'll be a while before they are, so until then you're looking at a lot of pain.
Its really no different than buying Apple for business use in 2010 (give or take). Lots of companies were starting to do it, but at that time there were only 4 Apple stores in the US that even had a "business team". Apple was not setup to handle it and still, to this day, are very very slow to roll out business centric features and functionality.
I don't think I've ever rented an SUV in my adult life. Other than the one time I needed a vehicle to go to the snow (and in that case, we ended up with an AWD equipped minivan anyways).
I would much prefer a Tesla Model 3 to most SUV options. Granted I have an EV so it doesn't scare me, but that's not everyone. A rental fleet should be diverse. Just because I don't want an SUV doesn't mean others don't. Different people, different wants and needs.
That's a crazy concept to even conceptualize. As a non-medically trained person, if I was to triage 5 injured people, assuming it wasn't terribly visually obvious (ex: missing leg)... I'd probably do a terrible job of it. Somehow they trained dogs to do so? Which really begs the question: What is the smell the dogs are looking for?
The author seemed to think that "Raspberry Pi = Easy" then promptly ran into early adopter pain combined with a general lack of knowledge. I'd like to see someone repeat this experiment, that was actually understanding of what they were getting into. Anyone with half a tick knowledge of RPI knows that it's not an amazing desktop machine, it's not supposed to be. It's a good "desktop" when you're in an environment that lacks significant technology access, infrastructure, and most importantly...power.
[1] https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/install-windows-11-raspb...
> If it's Boeing, I ain't going.
[1] https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/23039-if-it-aint-boeing-i...
Consulting is an excellent other option as well. Plenty of work in the security field if you get your name out there. Independent experts on small limited projects. Especially if you're doing things like external pen tests.
Man... the cognitive dissonance I went through mentally bouncing back and forth for a few minutes. I don't think I've ever experienced anything like that before in my life.
I'm glad all the top comments on HN are about Eva though.
Then on my breaks I just make sure to go outside and enjoy said sun.
> "best lighting is actual daylight in front of you ... Replacing the existing office lights with very warm toned lights"
So Daylight is good, yes. That's 5500k to 6500k, depending on how you measure it. It's NOT very warm-toned; in fact, it's cool white. The lights linked are 2700k. You can use them, but your camera is just going to try and compensate for the yellow hue. If you're going to buy something specifically for lighting video calls/recording, you should find something daylight with a higher CRI ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-CRI_LED_lighting ). You don't need to go crazy, but the difference between those $1 LED's and the $20 LED's you see at the store, is probably the CRI.
If you want GOOD lighting setup, go for 3 or 4 point lighting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-point_lighting -- You don't need a huge number of expensive lights, just lights set off to the side. Personally, I hate ring lights because they are designed for you to put the camera in the middle of them. If you have glasses, all you can see in the camera is the ring reflection. Even if you don't have glasses, you're now staring into the center of a giant blinding light. No thanks.