Having an IDE is like hiring a side-kick --- if the side-kick is component enough and you can afford them, why wouldn't you hire one?
616 karma · joined May 31, 2018
Having an IDE is like hiring a side-kick --- if the side-kick is component enough and you can afford them, why wouldn't you hire one?
No, only that electrons can exhibit light-like behaviours (e.g. interference patterns).
Light and pressure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure
> You're conflating electrons and electromagnetic radiation.
Isn’t that one of the main points of quantum physics? Light does apply pressure. Also photon exists?
A "graduate + AI" might be nearly as effective as "you + AI", while being significantly more... cost-efficient.
With SQL you need none of those.
I am not very familiar with how modern Python wsgi servers manage states, but in Java e.g. states can be cached in the heap of the one and same JVM --- can one say that the need to use an external state store like Redis is a direct result of the underlying web server having to launch multiple Python processes in order to scale up for greater loads?
One question regarding the states: when do I get a new State allocated? Is it with every new tab? It's definitely not per-browser-session: if I open a new tab I seem to get a new state, while undoing a closed tab seems to recover its state with it though.
Also are old states gc'ed?
This interpretation has the benefit (I think) of bypassing the problems with the "observers" --- any apparatus that is able to discern the path a particle had taken just so happens to impose a field such that, when superposed with the original "reality field" the double-slit imposes, the mixture field no longer exhibits the interference pattern.
Of course I am not a physicist by training, so the above could be completely nonsense (or it could have already been an established theory).
Think of it as a SQL engine for ad-hoc querying larger-than-memory datasets.
The next evolution towards general AIs would be the implementation of curiosity.
If the world ends tomorrow and the only way to avert it is to ban abortion then almost certainly yes, otherwise the baseline deal ought to be better.
New virus emerge naturally all the time, the same cannot be said for CP.
Also things can go wrong just due to bad luck. Someone's home caught fire doesn't necessary mean they are committing insurance fraud; majority of them will be genuine accidents.
It might be just me, but it would appear they are banking on 1) no individual start-up is going to bother to sue them over a slide deck because it's expensive, and 2) those who do notice the infringements would recognise that suing a group of debt-laden students/graduates won't amount to anything (hence the emphasis on "doing this to fund education" aspect).
> But our findings point to a more alarming hypothesis: that most companies ineffectively deploy their development teams, bogging down engineers with distractions, disruptions, and meetings as well as system inefficiencies, such as slow reviews, slow builds, and bad tools.
So what they are saying (presumably to company managements/executives) is that you can make your developers code more per day by adopting better tooling ("perhaps buy our products?"). To me, this sounds like a classic "manufacture anxiety then selling solutions" scheme.
It is also worth noting that the "developers spent most of the time thinking" argument against the claimed statistic won't stand when companies need to lay off the "low performers" based on how much time they spent coding --- after all, were you able to come up with the right solutions more quickly, you will be able to spend more time coding implementing them.
I'd call it a decentrailized surveillance system --- very robust against any attempt to dismantle it.
I get your point, but I am not sure how fresh our browser context is.
If yes, then Amazon is not "bowing", and it is The Guardian who is playing word games here. If not, then it would seem to imply that we are OK with western powers using their capital (instead of gunboats) to impose their ideology on other cultures in the world.
Now, one may argue that the customs and values of some countries are incompatible with those of the West and may even be considered "backward" to the point that western companies should completely withdraw from those markets because providing services to such markets equates to empowering those backward social values. That can be a fair assessment, but just remember not to blame them for "banning western companies" in the future.