RealStickman_

There are plenty of examples of terraforming going/having gone wrong or being abandoned. My first associations are Snowpiercer (overdoing the fight against climate change) and Stellaris (abandoned machinery on planets).

I maintain multiple packages on the AUR and PKGBUILDs are pretty easy to understand imo. I only had a look at one or two Nix package builds and they seemed much more complex to me.

Thst wouldn't be too hilarious actually. Browsers/Electron already support screen sharing so it shouldn't be too difficult to add in VSCode.

So that's (part of the reason) why booking was so relatively painless for my recent holidays. Another thing to thank the EU for.

Looks like breaking Windows is a feature now, going by the last comments in that issue.

A year ago most people probably wouldn't have known or cared about a small new fork and I don't think it would have gotten the community support OpenTF has now.

Alternatively, you can also buy your drives a few months apart to get different batches, most likely.

I'd think having wifi turned off while mobile services are on is very common when on the go.

They might support IOMMU, but the default groups can be very annoying to work with so you have to use a patched kernel as well that "ignores" the actual groups.

Not sure about those two you mentioned but Ansible as a similar tool does not have state. It needs to run every command and check what changed. Nix, from my understanding, does have state so it can be more efficient.

Fedora contributors are the ones maintaining the packages and they might have more work now if something breaks on the M1. This only "helps" Red Hat in that they can get more testing on ARM.

The package delays also apply to security updates btw. There's no procedure to get them in faster.

Ironically, on mobile Manjaro has shipped unstable and WIP patches, leading to issues and annoyed maintainers [0]

0. https://dont-ship.it/

No, that would exclude Alpine and I don't know any purist claiming that Alpine isn't Linux.

It's possbile to setup a keyfile in your boot partition to decrypt your root partition so you only have to enter a password once. But this really shouldn't be necessary.

I didn't know Tolino offered DRM-free ebooks, will definitely have to check them out. (According to the FAQ there are some Adobe protected ebooks, but that's rare)

I have to buy through one of the bookstores, right?

From what I heard mastodon.social is rather lacking in moderation and therefor limited by lots of other instances.

I went for fosstodon.org, as I think this suits my interests well enough, but there are other general or broad topic instances out there.

> I believe the .ML stands for Marxist Leninist

According to the link you posted, I think you're talkong about lemmygrad.ml. lemmy.ml is hosted by the original Lemmy developers.

That guy made a video about Techlore's video 8 months ago and didn't even watch the original video fully. I wouldn't trust his opinion.

Ok, but this statement is still true:

> Google's Play Store is the only source for a number of proprietary applications

I've only just dived a bit into the saga, though mostly on the Louis and Techlore side. Both of them have proof of negative behaviour by Micay, while one defense I found had basically no proof of Micay being harassed.

So, my question, do you have concrete proof about Micay being harassed? Screenshot, links, whatever can back up Micay's words.

I went down that rabbit hole yesterday, so I think I can offer some context.

First I started with Louis Rossmann's video. Basically, Louis left a single line comment below a 2 year old Techlore video discussing harassment of CalyxOS and random users by Daniel Micay. Because of this one comment, Micay accused Louis of being partially responsible for swatting attacks on Micay and harassment. You can see the chat in Louis' video.

Next I decided to watch the Techlore video to get a more complete understanding. After all, it could still just be Micay strongly disliking Louis for some reason. In his video Techlore then shows multiple examples of harassment by Micay targeted at CalyxOS and random users. All examples I heard him mention are backed up with chat logs in the video.

Lastly I watched a rebuttal to Techlore's video by Tom Sparks. Howerver it was obvious he had not actually watched the whole Techlore video and Sparks also mentioned that in his rebuttal. The focus of Spark's video was mainly on the chapter on targeting various companies from Techlore's video. With that focus Sparks basically dismissed Techlore's whole video and also accused Techlore of encouraging harassment of GrapheneOS without any proof at all!

Obviously there are always single individuals in any group that harass others. Here howerver, Louis and Techlore showed up with concrete proof of inacceptable behaviour and harassment while Micay only presents himself as a victim without proof of the harassment he is alleging of others.

Maybe you're confused about the client and server parts.

The client for Google Play Store can be replaced by other apps like the one you linked. Though this is against Google's TOS.

The server part of Google Play Store is where all the applications live. It is the biggest app repository for Android and most commercial apps are uploaded there. What the GP is advocating for is having developers upload their app to other app repositories in addition to the Play Store.

Access to some external sites might be necessary in some cases. They still have to monitor such connections.

And the other hand I often hear people complain about out of touch politicians regulating fields where they completely lack any understanding.

Minimum Viable Pawn

There's an xkcd for everything, but only 5 or so are linked regularly.

Good planning and monitoring will also prevent the last point from becoming a problem.

A table, by definition, is a surface upon which a cup can be placed. A cup holder on the other hand envelops the cup and prevents any sliding movement. This makes a cup holder ideal in moving vehicles.

An 01-A part should have the performance of a 02-B part while being less efficient.

A real pain point with IPv6 is being unable to make subnets smaller than /64. So much wasted space and hassle to get more than one network going.