[1] https://github.com/atom/xray/blob/master/docs/updates/2018_0...
2,804 karma · joined August 1, 2014
[1] https://github.com/atom/xray/blob/master/docs/updates/2018_0...
Moving most of the phone activities back to my computer or tablet makes it, like you said, a more conscious choice, and easier to not constantly check for updates.
If they’re not already installed, running one of those commands will prompt you to install them.
It can't replace a phone just yet, but the convenience for many tasks has made it a worthwhile purchase for me.
https://resilientwebdesign.s3.amazonaws.com/downloads/Resili...
For iOS, I find the Instapaper app to be a lot better than Pocket. A ton of font options that don't rely upon paying the Premium subscription, and the UI is less obtrusive. I also like that when you share links from the Instapaper app, it sends the actual link. Pocket's app shares links as redirects, so everything shows up as a shorthand pocket.co/nnnnnn type of link. Both can have links added by an iOS share sheet, which is convenient. Pocket does have a nice feature in the app where it can refresh the article, in case you know what you're reading is outdate.
No Android devices, so no clue how it works on that platform.
The web experience is mostly equal, although Instapaper looks cleaner and still has more font options available than Pocket.
Neither platform is perfect with regards to transcribing articles. While I haven't done direct comparisons, it seems to me that Pocket falls back on displaying the original webpage more often when the site isn't a normal blog or news article. When it does transcribe the page down, it seems to include less non-article stuff(social media links, etc.) than Instapaper does. It seems to be a wash there.
For my own personal conclusion, I like Instapaper more, but Pocket works well enough.
US App Store link: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/tis-100p/id1070879899