15 karma · joined October 22, 2014
My impression was always that the study of ecology and such is a big driver for technology, and by extension the economy and quality of life.
"In 1900, 40% of American automobiles were powered by steam, 38% by electricity, and 22% by gasoline.[19]"
The author wants all artists to be like Elon Musk, in how freely they can pursue their craft.
Employment rates and salaries for geologists, metallurgical engineers, pharmacists, one can go from poverty to well off in the span of a single generation with the right college degree.
That isn't to say there is no problem. I doubt that history will look at this disparity kindly. Perhaps better education about education, and what options and powers are available to us in general, would be wise.
>Moreover if death is natural process
humans are also a natural process.
>some alternative star may born by that time.
you mean a new star is going to come to our solar system before the sun dies? I think I must be misunderstanding. If not, that's asinine.
I don't really get how you can call it fearmongering. who is supposed to be afraid? most people only think as far ahead as two generations. the only people who are disturbed by your strange brand of environmentalism are people who think hundreds of years into the future, ie other environmentalists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_far_future
your billions figure is also a gross overestimate. our timeline is not so generous.
and don't forget that life took (actually) billions of years to evolve. what are you trying to protect on mars and venus that is more important than that?
the sun is dying. if humans don't 'develop' enough before then, it is unlikely that any of earth's legacy will be preserved.
that is, how should this good be taxed, is it something essential like food that should carry a low tax rate?
the analog computers used for that were really cool, check out some of the videos
as an extreme comparison, if it was a woman dominated field and they commonly wore shirts depicting scantily clad men with bulging pants, I think it would impact my desire to enter that field.
I don't know that the parents can be blamed so readily. Here in Los Angeles at least, I've been very dissaspointed with what my classmates consider appropriate.
I know that sometimes, images are first sent in black and white to save on data, color is sent later.
Hubble apparently only does black and white. color images can be obtained using a technique involving two of its black and white images. But that is a telescope, probably not similar.
http://hubblesite.org/gallery/behind_the_pictures/meaning_of...
the comet could just be grey, not sure about that one.
I don't think that's the case at all. It isn't a black and white issue, and I certainly don't feel it has been conclusively shown that if I start drinking drinks that are BOTH fizzy and sugary tomorrow, it will result in my telomeres shortening at an unusually high rate as the article claims. Is that really anti science? I don't think so.