194 karma · joined March 16, 2012
They really helped me as a buyer and while I don't know what they cost, I think I'd spring a couple hundred dollars to have it whenever we sell our house.
I think the biggest problem is that as a seller, I want qualified leads, but I get the feeling realtors just want leads because there's always another house. This mis-alignment of incentives means that in my experience listing agents don't always want to take steps that would limit foto traffic to a property, even if it would be excluding parties that probably wouldn't buy.
Doesn't current quantum teleportation require optical connectivity because the state transfers along photons?
The abstract says
>Here, we report the demonstration of chip-to-chip quantum teleportation and genuine multipartite entanglement, the core functionalities in quantum technologies, on silicon-photonic circuitry
So while there may not necessarily be a phsyical connection this does require line-of-sight by my read, and "silicon-photonic circuitry" sounds like this is all on one physical board.
I guess I don't understand how this is "two different chips" as the article claims. Did they use two photomasks? Baby steps, I suppose.
I use the Nine mail/calendar app[1] to keep all that contained. It integrates nicely with the native Android apps but keeps all of the security and control options within Nine itself. It looks like they are also beta testing an iOS app but I have no experience with that version of it.
For example, if the mail account security settings require a screen lock code, Nine will require a code to access the app but this won't affect the actual phone's unlock screen.
Similarly if a data wipe request is sent from the server it will only affect Nine.
Original research paper: http://www.ntt.co.jp/news2018/1807e/180718a.html
Twitter Blog: https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/insights/2...
"A website can request a page from Twitter in the background with JavaScript using standard browser APIs. That request will be made using login credentials (stored in cookies), so if you're logged into Twitter, that request will be made as you.
Our site implements common CSRF protections on POST requests to prevent actions being made on your behalf (for example, being able to send a Tweet). The browser also enforces a number of limitations on cross-origin requests for security reasons. For example, another origin cannot read the response content. However, the requesting page is able to determine how long the request took to load.
This timing data will only reveal information if the response times can be manipulated into result based on a specific user. Generally, your page load time will depend on the Tweets you're viewing, and these aren't easy to predict.
However, when you are blocked by another user, we prevent you from being able to load their profile page, and just show a basic empty page. That page is much faster to load than a profile full of Tweets.
In our tests, profile page load times reliably dropped from around 500ms to about 200ms. In this way, one user can affect the page load time of another user viewing a specific url."
https://www.thisamericanlife.org/668/the-long-fuse/act-three...
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-to-use-the-oneplus-...
I hadn't heard of that before. That's pretty cool.
"Magnetic Secure Transmission (MST) is a technology that emits a magnetic signal that mimics the magnetic strip on a traditional payment card. MST sends a magnetic signal from your device to the payment terminal's card reader (to emulate swiping a physical card without having to upgrade the terminal’s software or hardware)"
> In response to the report, ICANN labeled the .home and .corp strings as "high risk" and proposed that neither of the strings be delegated until it could be proven that risk is low. These two strings are currently severely delayed and some community members guess they may never be delegated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local#Microsoft_recommendatio...
Here's the link from the article with the download flag removed:
Buying a house? Make sure stuff is up to code, get an inspector, but it's on you.
Housing kids for the state? There's a public interest in making sure they're safe.
Renting out a room or building? Safe thing (and there are already regulations here that are stricter than those applying to private he owners)
Renting out a room or house short term? Again, same thing. This should at least be the same as a long term rental.
EDIT: anyway, my original point was that there is precedence for safety regs even if you don't have long hallways or tall buildings.
Was our house acceptably safe without those? Probably.
Is it going to be better now? Certainly. It's a bit of work installing 7+ devices, but I understand that we've reduced a lot of risk.
Same thing with the fire extinguishers and other safety equipment we'll have to pick up.
Rental units here have somewhat similar requirements, and I think short-term rentals should have similar safety features.