197 karma · joined September 11, 2017
I'm not against fasting, to be clear, it's all about what works best for you. And it's up to you to find out what it is.
Human body is a complex system, with so many twists and turns. The more dramatic diet you are trying to introduce, the more careful you have to be.
There is no quick and easy solution, do the fasting thing and you'll lose weight in 10 days and then you can eat whatever you want. No. It's about the choices you make every day, it's about lifestyle. Eat healthy (most of the time), sleep well, rest, exercise, manage stress.. and you should be fine.
So you might be right. My kids (6 and 8) told me a couple of times about life hacks that they saw on YouTube. And that's the only place they visit online, even that being restricted to less than an hour a day on average.
So yeah, new generations might be using that content a bit differently from what I thought.
If true, that is great news.
But, let's be realistic - percentage of people using TikTok to learn something is... probably negligible.
But there's an example on how the technology can be used in good purpose.
Looking from addiction perspective, TikTok is even worse. But, as the author said, it's more shallow, so it should be easier to move away from.
I hope that people (or at least majority) will find a way to move from this mindless fun and finally start using all the technology we have at our disposal in some more meaningful way.
So, you get more time because you don't have to vacuum yourself and it does it while you're not in, so the whole process is seamless.
It's not easy, but I love them.
Btw, my kids are 5 and 7 - to those of you with <4 years old kids, don't lose hope. As they grow and get more independent it gets easier. You'll have more time to get back to your side projects.
Look at this situation from the bright side - you are there for them now, when they need you the most, when their personalities are formed. Enjoy every moment, it will pass quicker than you think. Before you know it they'll be kicking you out of their room. And you'll be sad about it. ;)
Problem is - it doesn't work in the long term. It can work for a while, until your money runs out or someone more competitive comes along and blows you away.
As with many other things in life, there is now one-size-fits-all. For someone else, a complete opposite will work.
Stay informed, learn about different approaches, and simply choose what you think is best.
It's individual. I have a friend, overweight, never played any sport, never saw him run, sits 16h a day, sleeps 8h a day, has no problem with his back. Another one, skinny, does sports, sits on a pilates ball at work, uses standing table, stretching, and still has back problems.
You can't make conclusions based on your own case. We are all different people, different physiology. Medicine is not maths, 2 + 2 is not always 4. The fact that they can't explain RSI doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It's just that we don't fully understand what's going on there (yet).
The idea was to warn people in time about the consequences so that they can take precautions. I wish someone warned me about that 15 years ago.
~20 years ago I invested a lot of nerves into learning touch typing, so now I'm flawless with it.
But, let's talk about problems with touch typing - wrists for example. If you don't know touch typing, you move your hands more often, to do stuff. E.g. copy/paste, with touch typing, it's pinky + index finger all the time. Without touch typing, it's, for example, left index + right index. Or something else. Point is, you are not making the same moves all the time.
If you do, you develop RSI. For me, ALT + TAB was the problem. After ~15 years of touch typing, I started feeling first discomfort, and then pain in the wrist. Took some time to discover what's the problem, so now I'm aware and taking action, exercise, stretching, changing layout, switching to split keyboard, etc.
Touch typing is good, but be careful. Make breaks regularly, stretch your hands, invest in the ergo equipment. Think upfront, react before the problems occur. Better safe than sorry.
Whether it's smart and good for your business/reputation is a different question.
In general, we don't know much about this case. It's a post on Reddit, might not even be true. As is, it doesn't make much sense, but we don't know all the details, so maybe we jumped to conclusions.
Also, that doesn't cover other problems mentioned here, like natural disasters, ISP problems, etc.
What if a technical failure happen? What if there's a fire in the server room? What if there is an earthquake and the building collapses? What if... many things can happen that can result in a long, long downtime with this tactics.
If uptime is so crucial, the system should be setup in such way that moving one server should be a peace of cake, not a spec-ops mission.
Let's be philosophical: A journey of a thousand miles begins with a first step. We'll get there.
Most of the people still don't know about them. If more people knew about the benefits they bring, problems they solve, they would be much more popular. That would bring the price down, increase the choices available, bring them closer to the users. So you could probably go to a local shop and test it.
But they would lose the exclusivity feeling they have now. Which one do you choose?
It's more like an iteration of previous models, with some small tweaks and perks.
But I'm happy that split keyboard market is getting more and more attention.
Same thing works for companies. Leadership shapes the company. There is no one-size-fit-all strategy. What works for one company, doesn't work for another. Two pizza team size can work somewhere. Somewhere else something else will. People tend to look for manuals, instructions on how to do things, expecting that someone will write it all down and they just need to do what's written. From time to time, we get to hypes about something (check under microservices for example), everyone use it because it's popular, fancy, buzz word. Without thinking - do we really need this? It's like an epidemic (or pandemic?) of paper pushers, no one wants to take responsibility. To take action. And there is no responsibility if you do things as it's written in the manual, right?
Best methodology is - work with your team. Talk to the team. Know how they breathe. And they will tell you what to do, how to organise them, which methodology to use.
"Take care of your people and they will take care of your business."
Anyway, this has been a problem since forever. That's why all kinds of occupations like singer managers, sales, marketing etc. exist. It's all perfectly normal.
For you, it would be good to find someone compatible, someone to take care of presenting your work to the public while you can focus on creating.
We don't have "official data", this was just my opinion, based on my personal experience. I think most of the people start OSS for the reasons I mentioned, but what happens later depends on many things - success of the project, luck, type of personality of the owner, crossing paths, right place at right time, etc.
"Pure engineer" for me is someone who just wants to code, to solve a problem, and doesn't care a lot about other stuff. Even processes to organise the team (SCRUM meetings for example) are boring, waste of time. Not to mention other stuff. But that same person can, of course, change over time and go searching for other things. Me being an example - a significant part of my career I was like that, with a vision of being a technical lead or architect in the future. Until one day I realised I'm not so hyped about that anymore, that now other things motivate me. This document, 10 years ago, would be mostly new information for me. Probably not so interesting. Now it's old news for me, but it's as a "pure engineer's" good starting point, something to get him in the right direction if he wants to expand his competence toward monetising his OSS.