77 karma · joined December 16, 2012
I'd like to talk to someone with experience interfacing with factories in China about how the current approach could be replaced. Any suggestions?
Also, if I developed this tool-chain, what is the best way to attach to the market?
Read the article to see how FDM could become toxic/harmful, turns out it didn't.
http://archive.darpa.mil/darpatech99/Presentations/dsopdf/ds...
Turns out it's easy in controlled environments, and doesn't work at all outside. Once the animal sees something it wants to eat/mate with, it's just going to leave.
The claimed contribution of this work is direct ganglial stimulation as opposed to the antennal stimulation which was used previously. But I'm not seeing anything new in terms of capability/new science, and their data collection methods seem hinky:
The controllability of a roach, in terms of success rate, was subjectively rated based on user observation. If the user was able to successfully have the cockroach turn in a desired direction, then a run was deemed successful.
Should you approach someone for collaboration if you don't agree with how they're going about the project?
[1] http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/study-streng...
Any one have feedback on the concept? Or features we haven't thought of?
http://www.ted.com/talks/robert_full_the_secrets_of_nature_s...
As a rule of thumb, any walking robot that uses servos can't approach the performance of its animal colleagues. The leg impedance is way too high.
Basically I'm looking for Google's Project Tango, without the hardware constraints.
Because that graph shows modulus(stiffness), not strength. Which is pretty hinky when placed next to the statements about strength. Looks to be a bit misleading.
On top of that "stronger" has no meaning when it comes to composites. There are about 9 different failure modes, and you can't just choose one and report the "strength". I'm guessing they're talking about axial tension numbers (because I'm cynical) where their material would perform the best. Even then, their yield strength is about 200MPa (based on the "5x stronger than ABS" statement) whereas aluminum's yield strength tops out around 600MPa.
But the thing that I'm concerned about is the curing of the stuff. A composite gets its strength by having a low resin content, and I'm not sure this machine/process can pull it off. Based on the few available details, it's right to be skeptical.
Nike calling their sneakers "bio-inspired" because they had leopard spots on them was the worst.
I like the design much better than BD's weighty quadrupeds.
I disagree with this. Try constraining yourself to a wheelchair for a week or so, and then tell me nothing can be gained from a good set of legs.