Loyalty Nearly Killed My Beehive
nautil.us
nautil.us
To start, I read (believe it or not) Beeking for Dummies (http://www.amazon.com/Beekeeping-For-Dummies-Howland-Blackis...). It's a well rated book, and it has all the basic info. Then I watched various YouTube videos.
Then I ordered the following list of supplies. (I buy all my equipment from Mann Lake. $100+ it's free shipping. http://mannlakeltd.com/)
This is a list I recommend:
Note that the hive boxes and frames, are unassembled. Mann lake does have assembled hives. Assembly is easy, and I did it with my kids.
1) WW-605_b Med Hive Qty. 5 2) FR-811 Med Frames Case of 10. Qty. 5 (so you get 50 frames) 3) CV-305 Suit - economy - Medium (Buy YOUR size.) Qty. 1 4) HD-540 Smoker Qty. 1 5) CL-620 Economy cowhide leather gloves(Buy YOUR size. This is small) Qty. 1 6) HD-210 7D Nails (1lb) Qty. 1 7) HD-220 Frame Nails Qty. 1 8) HD-620 Hive tool 9) HD-660 Bee Brush 10) WW-310 Bottom Board 11) Your choice of top cover (buy with Inner cover)... http://www.mannlakeltd.com/beekeeping-supplies/page29.html I practice foundationless but some prefer not to deal with the cross comb headaches and use foundation. Foundation part number is (FN-720).
I adopted my hive from Jack at Los Altos Honey Bees (http://losaltoshoneybees.wordpress.com/). He goes and rescues feral colonies.
I also joined Beekeepers' Guild Of San Mateo County (http://www.sanmateobeeguild.org/). The club is great: the mailing list discussions keep me informed about things to do right now, and what to do to prepare for upcoming seasons.
That said, some also go in without a veil. This is _not_ a good idea. There was a very experienced (25+ years) beekeeper who told a story at the PA State meeting how he nearly died after knocking over a beehive.
I was out of commission for about a week after that. The whole right side of my face was swollen, and I couldn't see out of that eye for most of that time. It looked like I got in a fight and lost :)
And that was the last time I went into a hive without a veil.
What changes is you stop caring about being stung after a while, and you build up an immunity to it (stings start to swell less and clear up faster). And you learn to know when the hive is getting real angry, and it's time to back off for a while. But bees will be bees, and they sting things that mess with them.
Just in case anyone read the first paragraph and thought, "Hey that's a good idea!" Honey contains bacteria that causes infant botulism [1]. Once a child has a more fully developed digestive system, this is no longer a problem.
It's also mostly sugar and thus is not needed by tiny children. Avoiding it is probably a good idea for tooth health.
http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/pages/foods-...
"English teeth" is a bit of banter, but it's true. Tooth removal is the main reason to hospitalise (primary school age (4 to 11)) children. One in four children at five years old had some decay.
Being strict with sugar - especially in drinks - and proper toothbrushing will reduce this.
http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Dental-decay/Pages/Introduction...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10964323/Tooth-...
I've also seen honey used in burn dressings which was fascinating. Also grusome.
However I doubt it should be given to infants either and would not base any health decisions on anecdotes like this no matter how appealing the narrative.
Thanks for your clarification though!
It's not even an anecdote. It's a "short story by Roald Dahl". You know, fiction from a writer known for his "unsentimental, often very dark humour." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roald_Dahl
Really, don't base health decisions on surreal horror stories.
I like learning about the details of a new field, and I like to hear about issues facing beginners, but this article seemed somewhat pretentious and naïve. I'm all for admitting and learning from mistakes, but not making them into some Shakepearian drama (loyalty, death, duels). The whole tie-in with literature seemed formulaic, not to mention strained, as if it were an assignment for a writing class. I felt this story would've been better served with a straight-up blog-like narrative--just the facts. Not every story belongs in the New Yorker.
And now blogs are the gold standard for 'just the facts, ma'am'?
I quite liked the prose and the way it was written. Regardless, it was extremely well written and taught many of us non-bee keepers something new.
This figure is from an old study that others have repeatedly failed to reproduce. More recent attempts to determine queen longevity have shown they live to an average of about a year, and furthermore failed to find any of significantly advanced age. So it shouldn't too much of a surprise that she only lasted a season. Since there seem to be a few beekeepers hanging out here, I'd be curious to hear anecdotal evidence of queen lifespan.
I still miss the honey he'd bring by when I was a kid.
The other benefit is psychological - beekeeping requires an almost zen like approach when dealing with the hive. You cannot get angry or flustered, even when surrounded by thousands of bees desperately trying to sting you. You have to focus, be calm, and do the work.
Anyway- do you have any websites or other sources you would recommend to someone just getting started?
2 few things to know about beekeeping: * Beekeepers disagree on everything. * Bees have been surviving without humans for a long time.
So in general as long as you're not horrible and actively trying to kill your bees, they'll manage fine.
While this is true, the point in the article about 'feral' hives and genetic diversity was pretty interesting.
During high season, bees don't really hang around the hive; they leave and go forage. You can stand 2 meters in front of my hives and turn your back and have no idea there's a beehive anywhere near you.
But what I really want to tell is: > ...bees don't really hang around the hive; they leave and go forage.
When they change, and decide to hang around the hive, don't let anybody at the terrace, or near it in any way. That does not happen often, and does not last for long, but you better stay away for a while.
Likewise, you don't need to be garbed for most of your beekeeping activities. You can change out feeders or pop open the top for a quick peek without being bothered. Many beekeepers have found that they can pull frames or shuffle boxes if they are gentle and don't rile up the bees.
I don't keep them myself, but I have friends who do. AFAIK, you need to be concerned about:
* food/water - The bees will fly up to 2 miles to forage. So as long as you have flowering vegetation within 2 miles, you're good!
* predators - You want the hives to be reasonably protected from things like mice and raccoons. This is one reason boxes are raised up off the ground. If you live where there are bears, good luck.
* sun/moisture - I think too much shade and moisture can invite bugs, mites, mold, etc. I believe this is another reason the boxes are raised up off the ground, so the bottom box isn't just sitting in a puddle.
* access - You will need to be able to get to the hives sometimes. They will weigh a lot during honey season. And moving them, and extracting honey is messy. I had friends who put a hive a half mile into their sometimes swampy woods, and while the bees didn't care, the owners later regretted it.
Also, they actually forage up to 4 miles away [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forage_(honey_bee)]. Outside of that range, it is an energy negative (but some beekeepers will tell you that bees forage up to 7 miles away).
http://www.betterbee.com/beekeeping-state-and-federal-laws
http://www.sfgate.com/homeandgarden/honeybeechronicles/artic...
But you're not compelled to do anything - you can skip registering and take your chances!
If not, your local group is probably fighting to make it happen.
Any one have feedback on the concept? Or features we haven't thought of?
I've also heard rumors of old timers being able to tell when a colony is hungry just by putting an ear to the hive. It all makes me wonder what other kinds of information we could gather by studying the buzz.
Perhaps even just look at the heat retention against time accounting for external temperature (eg cooling rate at night vs. the ambient cooling curve) as that will give you the thermal capacity which should increase with increased honey volume. That should give you a first-order approximation at least (humidity would factor in to rule out waterlogging, not sure what the other main causes of hive weight change are beyond bee numbers which you'll also presumably have from the audio-volume and/or the ingress-egress readings).
If you haven't heard of it or checked it out, I recommend taking a look at what they've put together and maybe working with them (I also realize this may actually be YOUR project... if that is the case, please disregard).
OpenSourceBeehive (http://www.opensourcebeehives.net/index.html)
Should you approach someone for collaboration if you don't agree with how they're going about the project?
I have good story to share: we had 10 beehives at cabin in middle of woods and one of them got stolen! We moved remaining across the town to safer location. Carrying 100 pounds out of which 40 pounds are life bees is quite something :-)
Bee rustling is a thing! http://stories.weather.com/stolenbees
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&obj...
They usually have meetings and education/demo days, or at least would be happy to answer any questions that you have about keeping bees.
I think this is better than reading a book, because there are often special rules or challenges depending on where you live, and these are things that the local beekeepers would know about.
I have heard that some beekeepers use a trick where they keep a spare empty box somewhere else on their property. If the queen wants to swarm, she'll often decide to move into the empty box. Then the beekeeper gets to keep a hive that would otherwise be gone.
There's an interesting supply'n'demand thing going on as a result of the decline in the bee population, coupled with the growth of almonds as a cash crop: http://scientificbeekeeping.com/2012-almond-pollination-upda...
These were mainly family businesses and you had to be careful not to tailgate the wrong pickup truck, lest you wind up with a cloud of angry bees suddenly filling your car.
Bees are mighty good workers, I tell ya what.
Is there any rational advantage to keeping the beehive alive between the two queens, especially since the new queen is probably only remotely related in terms of genealogy? Is it just so the production of honey, propolis, etc remains uninterrupted? What happens if you let a beehive completely die and then put in a new queen? Would the beehive become too filthy for the new colony to develop easily?
Or does the author's wish to keep the beehive alive only stem from emotional attachment?
The hive won't be too "dirty" - bees are remarkably fastidious. The queen just won't survive/thrive without bees.
The best way to think about it is that while the queen is the center Of the hive, she is just one part of the whole organism. The bees will even kill her off if she stops producing and raise another queen.
Here, you can open a hive of "gentle bees" on a warm day and they will sit on the frames and basically completely ignore you.
There, I'm told once you take the lid off, most of the colony will take to the air to have a go at you. Which makes examining the frames easier, as they're no longer covered in bees - if there aren't too many on your veil, I guess.
We're on our 3rd season beekeeping; we just collected honey, last night.
In fact, I got my first ever bee/wasp/hornet sting ever, last night, from one of our bees. I was being sloppy, wearing running shoes under my bee suit, instead of boots. It hardly hurt at all, though. (I've had worse mosquito bites; so far, horseflies are the worst bites/stings I've ever had).
We captured our first swarm, this year, and got another hive "for free." Woo hoo!
As far as ordering stuff, since somebody mentioned it, we just go to http://www.beekeepers.com/ to get our gear, since our local farm stores don't carry much.
I am interested in these projects, so I can get my bee geek on, but I don't know if I should commit the time and money to them (any success stories out there)? http://www.opensourcebeehives.net/ http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Beekeeping http://openenergymonitor.org/emon/node/102
That has to make one unpopular with the neighbors.
Even my turkeys, quite possibly the dumbest animals I have around, don't mess with the bees any more after their first time!
I think a lot of people just mentally lump them together with wasps and hornets, which can be much more aggressive.
Usually a bee flies into hairs and can't escape, people panic and try to make it go away and then it stings.
It's not that bad, hurts for a few minutes only, if you are not allergic. My grandpa said it helps for reumatism and he tended to bees with only a veil.
I wonder if American bees are the same as European ones.
Trading queens and trying to switch them seems to be very popular here. I remember my parents trying to catch the queen in some grandpa hives.
Reading all this I feel a little bad for never being particulary intrested in bees, my parents even met in beekeeping high school, but they ended up working different jobs.
[1] http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/study-streng...
Personally, I'm here for the hacking content, not the startup content, although I'm occasionally interested by something from the startup camp.
I've been wondering, and no insult to the startup oriented crowd out there, if it would be possible to add a 3 tag system to HN posts; "startups", "hacking", "other".
The guidelines[1] state "On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups" which, in a naive sense, means that the simplest classification scheme would be the 3 terms listed previously.
This would allow a simple search query such as "-startups" to exclude posts tagged exclusively with "startups", or "-other -hacking" to include only posts tagged exclusively with "startups", or "+startups" to include any post with the tag "startups" etc.
As the CEO/Founder/President ("Beekeeper"), don't be meddling and over-involved in the day-to-day of your employees ("Bees"). Your job is just to steer them in the right direction, not to command every movement. As well, recognize when your idea ("Colony") is a bust and start new. You can't force a bad idea to be something it isn't.
I was reading the article while writing a user acquisition strategy. I almost died laughing.
I did mean 'meta' some what humorously. I had not expected it to be received so literally. Of course it is a subjective parallel.
Also, I think their are quantifiable parallels that many people on HN would relate too. It may explain the rise of a random bee keeping article. It would stand to reason that if the attributes and narrative were familiar it could possibly take on certain unconscious meaning to that group.
I ain't even mad. Just surprised no one else noticed. Like mad libs.