4,754 karma · joined March 9, 2017
TIL. Thank you.
It's a slight tangent, but it seems somewhat relevant - they're not only making so many recommendations, but the recommendations seem to be universally hated (judging by the comments here). It's like they're bragging about how epic their fuckup is.
These employees are optimizing for free time, not salary. As someone who thinks big tech pays ridiculously more than is necessary for a comfortable lifestyle, if I could work 1 day a week for 1/5 the pay I would (I understand why working so little would likely not make sense, I am just fantasizing).
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/07/judge-slams-fbi-...
People have this notion that the court system just blindly agrees with three lettered agencies, when in reality they tend to hate each other.
Sure, but if they lied about that isn't it an open-and-shut case of fraud? What they're doing here instead is obfuscating away everything behind an announcement, so there is no legal recourse for the consumer against their bullshit. The best we can do is hope an anti-trust suit is brought against Google (I have approximately zero hope of it happening because of this, though).
It seems like Python 2 is still pretty prevalent, with over 40% of new downloads taking place as of last year. And people forget Python 3 was originally introduced in 2008. So the transition is taking decades, not years.
The last place I worked was still using Python 2 as of last year, and they were a startup without all the bureaucracy of a big company. They also had plenty of money and engineers. Python 2 is still the default for everybody I know.
If you don't want to use your phone as a map that's fine, but it's incredibly convenient for (I'd wager) 99% of use cases.
Just download the map in advance.
> Historical maps
Agreed on this.
> Maps that aren't owned by Google
I agree with this in principle, but there are alternatives to Google Maps and some of them are even gaining popularity because developers in general are terrified of ever relying on Google for anything besides ads.
Isn't there a lot of uncertainty as to how well proof-of-stake will work?
You can watch the video. It pulls over incorrectly at first and is blocking traffic, then the support team made a mistake, and a hilarious escalation ensues with the vehicle actually attempting to run away from the support team multiple times!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/china-xinjiang...
https://www.thedailybeast.com/china-forcing-experimental-cor...
http://www.bu.edu/articles/2019/learn-from-nazi-medical-rese...
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/04/10/5227754...
The irony of this statement is you see it as evidence of there being no conspiracy, but I see it as exactly the opposite. Maybe everyone complaining about the same problem means the problem is real?
Yes, I'm calling you irresponsible.
This isn't hard. Seriously, you have lost all goodwill from me - anyone that isn't a fucking idiot could immediately solve this problem. But Amazon doesn't want to lose money, is what you really mean.
Fuck Amazon and fuck you. I have more respect for Facebook at this point.
Or maybe the SAT is just a shitty test.
I hear this a lot, but I've never seen it. I know plenty of people in tech making the better part of $1 MM a year at FAANG, and a few who even breach that. Most people I know in finance never break $500k.
So how much do people make in finance?
And I'm saying I think this is already happening, and the most talented senior employees are already starting to leave. This is going to take years, maybe decades to unravel. But I've already shifted away from buying things on Amazon because the experience has become significantly worse for me and I'm better off buying elsewhere.
You're welcome to disagree, but I think Amazon is no longer about value creation but value extraction. And quite frankly it doesn't matter if you feel differently as an employee, because that's how I feel as a customer.
I am glad you seem to enjoy working at Amazon, or at least have a respect for the culture. I've never been there so I can't comment on it, but I've heard lots of horrible things about the culture there. And lately the complaints have been shifting towards Amazon thinking more and more about short-term profits instead of the big picture.
All I can say is not everybody agrees with you.
This has nothing to do with thinking Amazon is all-powerful, and everything to do with thinking they don't care because it makes them money. Amazon's revenue is clearly skyrocketing and they make a ton of money because of the marketplace. It seems obvious to me they made the decision to put revenue/profits over long-term customer support.
You believe that Amazon wants to solve the problem. I believe Amazon doesn't want to solve the problem, because they make more money not solving it now. And talking about the long-term vision of a company whose founding CEO just stepped down is pretty meaningless.
I'll be more blunt. Amazon saying they care about fake reviews is like Facebook saying they care about privacy. They make money by lying about it, not fixing it. Facebook clearly hasn't suffered the long term damage of years of horrible PR using their stock price as a metric (you know, the only metric that really matters), and Amazon likely won't either (in fact they've had just as much bad PR and look at them now).