315 karma · joined December 9, 2014
Maybe took a major downturn in the past year, but I haven't seen any evidence of that
This is a specific policy to allow them to enforce their censorship laws in other countries.
You could engage a labor lawyer, but if this was pre-series A and the founder was self-funding, there might not be any personal assets there either.
If you think the folding of the company is in good faith, you might just want to take the loss on this one.
tl;dr - for the core phone/laptop F.lux use case, no, it isn't substantiated
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya (who I am)
You killed my father (why I'm reaching out)
Prepare to die (my ask / expectation)
So doing a side-channel attack on the sensor, and designing a pump system to dynamically adjust the rate dozens of times a second. Hacking at its finest
"pfSense® Plus software version 21.02 and pfSense Community Edition (CE) software version 2.5.0 include a major OS version upgrade, a kernel WireGuard implementation..."
This is a kernel RCE just waiting to happen.
This seems as good a way as any to do it to me.
"You understand and agree that the Services are provided to you on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis."
and
"The Twitter Entities make no warranty or representation and disclaim all responsibility and liability for: (i) the completeness, accuracy, availability, timeliness, security or reliability of the Services or any Content;"
Doesn't feel like something you should be conducting international diplomacy with...
This is an automatic no-way for React for any major company