85 karma · joined June 28, 2010
>Elements of the recordings that are easily perceived are represented with exacting precision, while other parts that are not very audible can be represented less accurately. Meanwhile, inaudible information can be discarded altogether.
Fraunhofer Institute
I have 15,000 songs in my iTunes library, the vast majority of which are not on Spotify. My 16GB iPhone would normally only hold a fraction of my music but with an iTunes Match subscription I have access to it all.
Also, it gives an off-site back up of every matched song. So tell me, how is iTunes Match similar to Spotify?
If the writer of the TFA experiences 4 seconds of emptying his mind and a state of bliss, does it really matter that he didn't in your opinion use the correct terminology? or wasn't in the state long enough for this or that term to apply?
I enjoyed the article, it has inspired me to take up my own practise again, even 1 second of no thoughts and blissful awareness at the beginning of my day changes everything.
"Saying Windows is equal to Macintosh is like finding a potato that looks like Jesus and believing you've witnessed the second coming".
Seems to cover it to me
Many companies in the tech sector have effectively been using Apple as their R&D department for decades. Samsung is just the latest and most blatant.
http://www.examiner.com/article/the-obama-administration-s-s...
Just saying
It is akin to borrowing a book and then scanning it and using OCR to make an ebook before it is returned to the owner. Or ripping a friend's CD. I don't think a reasonable person would describe this as stealing. This is exactly what file sharing is, except that the scanning/ripping has already been done.
By insisting that this is "stealing" you will alienate some people who might be open to persuasion and to changing their behaviour. They know that they have not deprived the owner of it's use and that they have not stolen anything.
Stop talking about stealing, it's lazy