73 karma · joined September 17, 2009
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfNHX_gVKJ0
Watch all seasons of The Larry Sanders Show!
https://github.com/donovanhide/stockfighter
Based on the docs and only tested against the unauthenticated endpoints so far...
Yes, and for highlighting off-topic subjects, there is the simple moderator acronym "OT". A rigid rule book and enforcement policy has nothing to do with free speech. It's all about trying to balance the inequalities in the tech sector. Unfortunately, a rule book is not going to solve that problem. The cynic in me just thinks this a conference "feel-good" announcement planned as a result of Googlers feeling bad about the fact that they are a 83% male workforce.
If the real problem is going to be solved, it's got to be about encouraging and educating people from all genders and races to code. That starts much earlier than any engagement in online communities. If the output of schools and colleges of trained coders was balanced, all the horror stories of harassment and abuse would soon become history as the workforce also becomes balanced, in my opinion.
I strongly dislike the idea of self-appointed judiciaries. Mistakes happen. The nuances of behaviour of people with mental health issues is likely to get caught up in these rule books. That's why we have courts, to help deal with difficult cases. Vigilantes may well refer to the code of conduct for justification for statements of intent like this:
http://dave.cheney.net/2015/06/13/listen-up
I'm not comfortable with that.
https://twitter.com/bbc_micro_/status/572313372345016321
The plastic which held them in place was always broken on the school computers :-)
In all seriousness though, I personally owe a great debt to Sophie Wilson et al for building computers and software that made it very easy to start programming the second after turning a computer on; A BASIC interpreter and an Assembler available instantly from ROM. I had endless hours of fun building parallax scrolling star fields by poking directly to video RAM and slowly rendering 3d scenes in Render Bender. It was just a shame that the computers were so expensive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shake_%28software%29
"Existing maintenance program subscribers had the option to license the Shake source code for $50,000 USD."
Didn't bdb's linear hashing scheme extend the size of the hash table enough to keep it at the required loadfactor?
http://www.reddit.com/r/ripplers/comments/266m12/selling_my_...
Thanks for the downvote :-)
But the short variable declaration in the type switch does indeed save the casts the OP was complaining about.
Even more correct and horrible: http://play.golang.org/p/ZMQKQhuUQT
func abs(x Top) Top {
switch v := x.(type) {
case int32:
if v < 0 {
return -v
}
case int64:
if v < 0 {
return -v
}
case float32:
if v < 0 {
return -v
}
case float64:
if v < 0 {
return -v
}
}
return v
} ./bin/Heartbleed openssl.org:443
2014/04/08 12:15:44 ([]uint8) {
00000000 02 00 79 68 65 61 72 74 62 6c 65 65 64 2e 66 69 |..yheartbleed.fi|
00000010 6c 69 70 70 6f 2e 69 6f 59 45 4c 4c 4f 57 20 53 |lippo.ioYELLOW S|
00000020 55 42 4d 41 52 49 4e 45 47 69 05 e8 90 a6 60 d6 |UBMARINEGi....`.|
00000030 b4 18 c3 f0 4a 20 40 3a ef dd 06 8b 87 32 42 00 |....J @:.....2B.|
00000040 00 00 10 00 0e 00 00 0b 6f 70 65 6e 73 73 6c 2e |........openssl.|
00000050 6f 72 67 00 05 00 05 01 00 00 00 00 00 0a 00 08 |org.............|
00000060 00 06 00 17 00 18 00 19 00 0b 00 02 01 00 00 0d |................|
00000070 00 0a 00 08 04 01 04 03 02 01 02 03 09 14 ce 7c |...............||
00000080 6d 0c f5 a0 3b cc 16 aa 3b d4 b1 b8 |m...;...;...|
}
2014/04/08 12:15:44 openssl.org:443 - VULNERABLEhttps://ramcloud.stanford.edu/wiki/download/attachments/1137...
And an implementation:
https://github.com/goraft/raft
Decentralised conversations :)
Answer 2: bletchley
Answer 3: ?
Answer 4: colossus
Answer 5: secured
Don't feel like supporting this recruitment drive, to be honest. GCHQ appears to be the rolling data buffer for the NSA...
http://readwrite.com/2010/05/18/free_mobile_facebook_with_0f...
Network neutrality is an irrelevance to someone who cannot afford Internet access. First world problem :-)