Wikipedia Zero grows readership in Africa and Asia
blog.wikimedia.org
blog.wikimedia.org
First net neutrality is broken for obviously good sites: Wikipedia & Co. Then it is broken for obviously useful sites: Google, Gmail, Hotmail, Facebook. Then news sites. Then some sport sites. In the end new sites (let's call them competitors) will find themselves confined in the "for pay" area, unable to enjoy the growth of the other sites (let's call them incumbent) because they cannot afford the expensive fees that the carries will charge to move you to the "for free area".
I do not like this trend. I especially do not like Wikipedia and Africa being used as pilot cases for breaking the network neutrality.
Network neutrality is an irrelevance to someone who cannot afford Internet access. First world problem :-)
However, like others commenting, I think in this instance it's a good thing. It wouldn't even have to be Wikipedia for this to be my opinion; we could see Facebook Zero and I would like it. My take on it is, it's better to have something with a catch than nothing at all. Think of the Space Race: should government be controlling the rockets? Should taxpayers be footing the bill for this immense research? It got us off the ground, and I would argue that's a good thing. Now there is a booming private space industry, because the initial investment, while cause for concern, got people demanding space technology.
If people in African and Asian nations get a taste for web services, for the spread of information, for the ease of communication the Internet can offer, I'm predicting a similar end as the Space Race: private industry will boom once the demand reaches a high enough level. While net neutrality might be at risk in the short term, the important thing is getting the ball rolling. I can't predict the future, but I can extrapolate from the past. People will be demanding this technology in developing markets, and with the Internet comes education, business, and opportunities for improving the quality of life.
An article[2] about it was submitted to HN a little while ago, and it argued that Facebook Zero is an attempt get people to think that "internet" and "Facebook" are synonyms.
[2]: Possibly: http://qz.com/5180/facebooks-plan-to-find-its-next-billion-u... It's not loading for me so I can't be sure, but it is in my browser history.
http://readwrite.com/2010/05/18/free_mobile_facebook_with_0f...
I hope to see a good discusion here