DJBunnies

He wouldn’t know majesty if it came up and bit him in the face.

That’s a little obtuse. Macs can still poll for certain messages while they’re asleep (Power Nap.)

How’s that? Zcash is opt in privacy, Monero is by default.

Actually with today’s levels of chain analysis, Monero would be a better coin pick from a privacy perspective.

Did you audit the code?

Ever seen somebody type on a keyboard that learned on a typewriter?

Flip side: What if somebody needed to identify one?

“Is this thing dangerous?”

> Nope.

I feel like well defined RFCs and standards are easily coded against, and I question the investment/value/time tradeoff here. These things happily regurgitate training data, but seriously struggle when they don’t have a pool of perfect examples to pull from.

When Claude can do something new, then I think it will be impressive.

Otherwise it’s just piecing together existing examples.

Samurai Jack too, we like good colors and style and writing.

Luddite.

We need a cash/credit alternative, and it’s currently our best shot.

That’s not irony tho.

If only we had checksums or file hash integrity.

You obviously have not worked a lot, this term is everywhere from my experience, ubiquitous even.

Terms like this one, “alignment”, “low hanging fruit”, all not super accurate but established industry terms.

You could have done all that for your peers instead.

The whole JavaScript ecosystem is a mess.

Eth is governed by those with the biggest stacks, so it’s not really something to be taken seriously.

If only we had a mechanism for demonstrating correct and incorrect ways to use a particular software.

We could expect failure conditions or assert correct outcomes.

It could become a little library of examples that change over time, as the software changes, granting us peace of mind that everything still works.

Because people are dumb and don’t want a book that you have to recharge every day.

I think a better question here is: why is game code so exploitable?

A: laziness and cost. It just doesn’t matter the same way that baking code matters, I guess.

So they toss on some cheap anti cheat instead of architecting it safely (expensively.)

Yea but TSMC produces good stuff.

Yeah why did he rebase unreleased code?

And the “right” RC only has to be right enough to solve the issue.

I think we’ve worked for the same org

I’m skeptical it has basis in medicine, but I’m here to see too.

Yea but it’s coupled with an incredibly leaky distribution system.

It would be so great to regulate fixing that instead of getting rid of it entirely.

Ok I’ll bite, higher hashrate (bitcoin) means it’s more secure from attacks.

So it’s not being burned, it has a purpose here.

I mean sure, you can take the “high road” and belittle its users and how they have a different area of focus than yours, but the reality is that skipping linkedin will 100% make you miss engineering opportunities.

But you still get to scoff, so that’s something.

Yeah it was a kaizen ticket the group filed after the last sprint.

Uhhh, physics?

Not exactly universal as such.

Wild world you must live in.